---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | | Bolt shear phi | 0.75 | 0.80 | gamma_M2 = 1.25 | 0.80 | | Bearing phi | 0.75 | 0.90 | gamma_M2 = 1.25 | 0.80 | | Net section phi | 0.75 | 0.85 (rupture) | gamma_M2 = 1.25 | 0.75 | | Hole deduction | d_hole + 1/16 in | d_hole + 2 mm | d_hole (no addition for punched holes ≤ 25mm) | d_hole + 2 mm | | Bearing formula | 2.4 d t Fu (deformation) | 3.2 d t fu (per bolt) | 2.5 d t fu / gamma_M2 | 3.0 d t Fu | | Block shear | 0.6 Fu Anv + Ubs Fu Ant | 0.6 fy Agv + fu Ant | Similar approach per Cl. 3.10.2 | 0.6 Fu An + Ubs Fy Ag | | Slip-critical (Class A) | mu = 0.30, phi = 1.0 or 0.85 | mu = 0.35, phi = 0.70 | mu = 0.20, gamma_M3 = 1.25 | mu = 0.30, phi = 0.82 | | Tension-shear interaction | (ft/phi Fnt')^2 + (fv/phi Fnv)^2 <= 1.0 (modified) | Linear (Vf*/phi Vf + Ntf*/phi Ntf <= 1.0) | (Fv/Fv,Rd)^2 + (Ft/Ft,Rd)^2 <= 1.0 | Elliptical interaction |

Geometry & detailing

Demand definition

Failure modes (ensure you at least consider them)

Documentation

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most common error in bolted connection calculations? Hole type mismatch. Using standard hole deductions when the detail calls for oversize or slotted holes changes net area and bearing calculations significantly.

Should I check both bearing and slip-critical? If the connection is specified as slip-critical, the slip check governs serviceability. Bearing and shear checks still apply as ultimate limit states. Both should be documented.

Why does the calculator show different results than my hand check? The most frequent causes are: different hole deduction conventions, different clear distance formulas for tear-out, or a mismatch between threads-included vs threads-excluded shear capacity. Check these before assuming either result is wrong.

Does this checklist apply to all bolt standards? It is standard-agnostic. The items apply whether you are working with AISC 360, AS 4100, EN 1993-1-8, or CSA S16, but the specific factor values and detailing limits differ by code.

Is this checklist engineering advice? No. It is a documentation and QA pattern to help reduce errors and improve traceability. Project criteria and compliance decisions are defined by the governing standard and the engineer of record.

What is the standard hole diameter for a 7/8-inch A325 bolt per AISC Table J3.3, and how does it affect net area calculations? Per AISC 360-22 Table J3.3, the standard hole diameter for a 7/8-inch bolt is 15/16 inch (0.9375 in). For net area calculations per AISC Section B4.3, an additional 1/16 inch is deducted to account for damage during punching, giving an effective hole diameter of 1-1/16 inch (1.0625 in) for net area calculations — even though the actual hole is only 15/16 inch. For an oversize hole (1-1/16 inch actual), the effective deduction becomes 1-3/16 inch. This 1/16-inch damage allowance is a common source of discrepancy between hand checks and calculator outputs.

What minimum pitch and minimum edge distance apply to 3/4-inch bolts in standard holes per AISC? Per AISC 360-22 Section J3.3, the minimum center-to-center pitch is 2-2/3 × d_b = 2.0 inches for 3/4-inch bolts, but 3 × d_b = 2.25 inches is preferred. Per AISC Table J3.4, the minimum edge distance for a 3/4-inch bolt to a sheared edge is 1-1/4 inches and to a rolled/gas-cut edge is 1 inch. The absolute minimum clear distance for bearing (J3.10) is 1.5 × d_b = 1.125 inches from the hole edge to the material edge, measured in the direction of force. Maximum edge distance per J3.5 is the lesser of 12t or 6 inches (for unpainted members in contact), where t is the thickness of the connected element.

Run This Calculation

→ Bolted Connection Calculator — bolt shear, bearing, tension, and block shear checks per AISC 360, AS 4100, EN 1993, and CSA S16.

→ Gusset Plate Calculator — gusset plate and weld design for bracing connections.

→ Splice Connection Calculator — beam and column splice bolt group design.

Related pages

Disclaimer (educational use only)

This page is provided for general technical information and educational use only. It does not constitute professional engineering advice, a design service, or a substitute for an independent review by a qualified structural engineer. Any calculations, outputs, examples, and workflows discussed here are simplified descriptions intended to support understanding and preliminary estimation.

All real-world structural design depends on project-specific factors (loads, combinations, stability, detailing, fabrication, erection, tolerances, site conditions, and the governing standard and project specification). You are responsible for verifying inputs, validating results with an independent method, checking constructability and code compliance, and obtaining professional sign-off where required.

The site operator provides the content "as is" and "as available" without warranties of any kind. To the maximum extent permitted by law, the operator disclaims liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of, or reliance on, this page or any linked tools.