EN 1993-1-1 Column Buckling — Worked Example
This worked example demonstrates the complete verification of a pin-ended steel column under concentric axial compression, following EN 1993-1-1:2022 with UK National Annex parameters. Educational use only — always verify by a qualified engineer.
Problem Statement
Column: 203×203×60 UKC, Grade S355JR (EN 10025-2) Length: 4.0 m, pinned at both ends (L_cr,y = L_cr,z = 4.0 m) Loading: N_Ed = 1,200 kN (factored ULS axial load, including self-weight)
| Action | Value |
|---|---|
| Design compression | N_Ed = 1,200 kN |
| Buckling length y-y | L_cr,y = 4.0 m |
| Buckling length z-z | L_cr,z = 4.0 m |
Section properties (from SCI P363 Blue Book — 203×203×60 UKC):
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Depth h | 209.6 mm |
| Width b | 205.8 mm |
| Web thickness tw | 9.4 mm |
| Flange thickness tf | 14.2 mm |
| Root radius r | 10.2 mm |
| Area A | 76.4 cm² |
| Iy | 6,090 cm⁴ |
| Iz | 2,060 cm⁴ |
| iy | 8.93 cm |
| iz | 5.20 cm |
| Wpl,y | 654 cm³ |
Material: S355JR steel to EN 10025-2
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| fy (tf ≤ 16 mm) | 355 N/mm² |
| fu (3 < tf ≤ 100 mm) | 470 N/mm² |
| E | 210,000 N/mm² |
| γ_M0 (UK NA) | 1.00 |
| γ_M1 (UK NA) | 1.00 |
| ε = √(235/fy) | √(235/355) = 0.814 |
Step 1 — Section Classification (Table 5.2)
Flange Classification
The flange is an outstand compression part in uniform compression:
c = (b - tw - 2r) / 2 = (205.8 - 9.4 - 20.4) / 2 = 88.0 mm
c / tf = 88.0 / 14.2 = 6.20
Limiting c/tf ratios per Table 5.2 (outstand flange in compression):
| Class | Limit | c/tf | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9ε = 9 × 0.814 = 7.33 | 6.20 ≤ 7.33 | Class 1 ✓ |
Web Classification
The web is an internal compression part in uniform compression:
cw = h - 2tf - 2r = 209.6 - 28.4 - 20.4 = 160.8 mm
cw / tw = 160.8 / 9.4 = 17.1
Limiting cw/tw ratios per Table 5.2 (web in uniform compression):
| Class | Limit | cw/tw | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 33ε = 33 × 0.814 = 26.9 | 17.1 ≤ 26.9 | Class 1 ✓ |
Result: Section is Class 1 — full plastic compression resistance may be used.
Step 2 — Cross-Section Compression Resistance Nc,Rd (Cl. 6.2.4)
For a Class 1, 2 or 3 cross-section in uniform compression:
Nc,Rd = A × fy / γ_M0
= 76.4 × 10² × 355 / 1.00
= 2,712 × 10³ N
= 2,712 kN
Utilization: N_Ed / Nc,Rd = 1,200 / 2,712 = 0.44 ✓ (44%)
The cross-section is adequate by a wide margin. However, for a slender pin-ended column, flexural buckling will govern (Step 3).
Step 3 — Flexural Buckling Resistance Nb,Rd (Cl. 6.3.1)
3a — Non-Dimensional Slenderness
λ₁ = π × √(E / fy) = π × √(210,000 / 355) = 76.4
For each axis:
λ_bar_y = (L_cr,y / iy) / λ₁ = (4,000 / 89.3) / 76.4 = 44.8 / 76.4 = 0.587
λ_bar_z = (L_cr,z / iz) / λ₁ = (4,000 / 52.0) / 76.4 = 76.9 / 76.4 = 1.007
The z-z axis governs (higher slenderness).
3b — Buckling Curve Selection (Table 6.2)
For hot-rolled I-sections under compression, the buckling curve depends on the section geometry:
h / b = 209.6 / 205.8 = 1.02 ≤ 1.2 tf = 14.2 mm ≤ 100 mm
| Axis | Curve | α (imperfection factor) |
|---|---|---|
| y-y | b | 0.34 |
| z-z | c | 0.49 |
Use curve c (governing axis with α = 0.49).
3c — Reduction Factor χ_z
Φ = 0.5 × [1 + α × (λ_bar - 0.2) + λ_bar²]
= 0.5 × [1 + 0.49 × (1.007 - 0.2) + 1.007²]
= 0.5 × [1 + 0.49 × 0.807 + 1.014]
= 0.5 × [1 + 0.395 + 1.014]
= 0.5 × 2.409 = 1.205
χ_z = 1 / [Φ + √(Φ² - λ_bar²)]
= 1 / [1.205 + √(1.205² - 1.007²)]
= 1 / [1.205 + √(1.452 - 1.014)]
= 1 / [1.205 + √0.438]
= 1 / [1.205 + 0.662]
= 1 / 1.867 = 0.536
3d — Buckling Resistance
Nb,Rd,z = χ_z × A × fy / γ_M1
= 0.536 × 76.4 × 10² × 355 / 1.00
= 1,454 × 10³ N
= 1,454 kN
Utilization: N_Ed / Nb,Rd,z = 1,200 / 1,454 = 0.83 ✓ (83%)
The column is adequate for flexural buckling. The 17% margin is typical for a moderately loaded column at this slenderness.
3e — Check y-y Axis (Informative)
For completeness, checking the y-y axis even though z-z governs:
From curve b (α = 0.34):
Φ_y = 0.5 × [1 + 0.34 × (0.587 - 0.2) + 0.587²]
= 0.5 × [1 + 0.34 × 0.387 + 0.345]
= 0.5 × [1 + 0.132 + 0.345]
= 0.5 × 1.477 = 0.739
χ_y = 1 / [0.739 + √(0.739² - 0.587²)]
= 1 / [0.739 + √(0.546 - 0.345)]
= 1 / [0.739 + 0.448]
= 1 / 1.187 = 0.842
Nb,Rd,y = 0.842 × 76.4 × 10² × 355 / 1.00 = 2,284 kN
Utilization: 1,200 / 2,284 = 0.53 ✓ (53%) — significantly less critical as expected.
Step 4 — Combined Buckling Curve Comparison
The difference between buckling curves under EN 1993-1-1 is significant. For this column (λ_bar_z = 1.007):
| Curve | α | χ | Nb,Rd (kN) | Utilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | 0.21 | 0.653 | 1,772 | 0.68 |
| b | 0.34 | 0.590 | 1,601 | 0.75 |
| c | 0.49 | 0.536 | 1,454 | 0.83 |
| d | 0.76 | 0.444 | 1,204 | 1.00 ✗ |
This illustrates why the correct buckling curve selection per Table 6.2 is critical — using curve d would predict failure, while curve a would be unconservative.
Step 5 — Summary
| Check | Governing Clause | Utilisation | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Section classification | Table 5.2 | Class 1 | ✓ |
| Compression resistance Nc,Rd | Cl. 6.2.4 | 0.44 (44%) | ✓ |
| Flexural buckling Nb,Rd (z-z, curve c) | Cl. 6.3.1 | 0.83 (83%) | ✓ |
| Flexural buckling Nb,Rd (y-y, curve b) | Cl. 6.3.1 | 0.53 (53%) | ✓ |
Conclusion: A 203×203×60 UKC in S355 steel is adequate for the design axial load of 1,200 kN, governed by flexural buckling about the minor axis at 83% utilisation. The section is Class 1, allowing full plastic section resistance. The correct selection of buckling curve per Table 6.2 is critical — curve c applies for UKC sections (h/b ≤ 1.2) about the minor axis.
This worked example is for educational purposes. All designs must be verified by a qualified engineer. Use the EN 1993 column buckling calculator to check other sections or load cases.