AS 4100 Beam Design Worked Example — 310UB40.4
Complete AS 4100:2020 beam design walkthrough: section moment capacity (Ms), shear capacity (Vv), lateral torsional buckling (Mb), web bearing, and deflection. The worked example designs a 310UB40.4 Grade 300 steel beam spanning 7.2m at 3.6m tributary spacing. All code references are to AS 4100:2020.
This page covers the full beam design workflow under the Australian limit state standard. The Steel Calculator WASM engine performs these checks automatically for AS 4100, AISC 360, EN 1993, CSA S16, and IS 800.
PRELIMINARY — NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. All results are for educational and reference use only and must be independently verified by a Chartered Professional Engineer registered with Engineers Australia before use in any project.
Design Problem Definition
A floor beam in a Melbourne office building spans 7.2m between columns with a 3.6m tributary width. The beam is simply supported with lateral restraint provided by the concrete slab at 1.8m centres (purlin spacing). The slab is composite with shear studs, but for this example we treat the beam as a bare steel member carrying construction-stage dead load plus the imposed live load from the composite slab.
Design Data:
- Span: L = 7.2 m, simply supported
- Tributary width: 3.6 m
- Dead load: 2.5 kPa (slab), 0.5 kPa (services/ceiling) = 3.0 kPa
- Live load: 3.0 kPa (office floor, AS 1170.1 Table 3.1)
- Lateral restraint spacing: L_ry = 1.8 m (composite slab decking secured at 1.8m centres)
- Section: 310UB40.4 Grade 300 (AS/NZS 3679.1, Grade 300PLUS)
- Steel: fy = 300 MPa (flange t_f = 10.2mm <= 20mm — full yield strength applies)
Line Loads:
- G = 3.0 kPa x 3.6 m = 10.8 kN/m
- Q = 3.0 kPa x 3.6 m = 10.8 kN/m
- ULS: w* = 1.2G + 1.5Q = 1.2 x 10.8 + 1.5 x 10.8 = 29.2 kN/m
- SLS: w_sls = G + 0.7Q = 10.8 + 0.7 x 10.8 = 18.4 kN/m
Design Actions:
- M* = w* x L^2 / 8 = 29.2 x 7.2^2 / 8 = 189.0 kN.m
- V* = w* x L / 2 = 29.2 x 7.2 / 2 = 105.1 kN
- R*_support = 105.1 kN
Section Properties — 310UB40.4 Grade 300
Australian universal beams are manufactured to AS/NZS 3679.1 in Grade 300PLUS by InfraBuild. The 310UB40.4 is a medium-weight beam suitable for floor framing in multi-storey construction.
Geometric Properties
| Property | Symbol | Value | Units |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | d | 304 | mm |
| Flange width | b_f | 165 | mm |
| Flange thickness | t_f | 10.2 | mm |
| Web thickness | t_w | 6.1 | mm |
| Root radius | r | 11.4 | mm |
| Depth between flanges | d_1 | 283.6 | mm |
| Area | A_g | 5,150 | mm^2 |
| Second moment of area (major) | I_x | 85.0 x 10^6 | mm^4 |
| Elastic section modulus | Z_x | 559 x 10^3 | mm^3 |
| Plastic section modulus | S_x | 640 x 10^3 | mm^3 |
| Torsion constant | J | 160 x 10^3 | mm^4 |
| Warping constant | I_w | 79.7 x 10^9 | mm^6 |
| Radius of gyration (minor) | r_y | 33.2 | mm |
| Mass per metre | — | 40.4 | kg/m |
Step 1 — Section Classification (AS 4100 Clause 5.2)
Section classification determines which moment capacity formula applies and whether the section can develop its plastic moment. AS 4100 Table 5.2 gives the limiting width-to-thickness ratios for Class 1 (Plastic), Class 2 (Compact), Class 3 (Non-compact), and Class 4 (Slender).
Flange Slenderness
The outstand flange slenderness parameter:
lambda_e = (b_f - t_w) / (2 x t_f) x sqrt(f_y / 250)
lambda_e = (165 - 6.1) / (2 x 10.2) x sqrt(300 / 250) = 7.79 x 1.095 = 8.53
Class 1 limit: lambda_ep = 9 —> 8.53 < 9, flange is Class 1 (Plastic).
Class 2 limit: lambda_ey = 16 —> 8.53 < 16, confirmed.
Web Slenderness
For a web in pure bending:
lambda_e = (d_1 / t_w) x sqrt(f_y / 250)
lambda_e = (283.6 / 6.1) x 1.095 = 46.49 x 1.095 = 50.91
Class 1 limit: lambda_ep = 45 —> 50.91 > 45, web is NOT Class 1.
Class 2 limit: lambda_ey = 82 —> 50.91 < 82, web is Class 2 (Compact).
Class 3 limit: lambda_ey = 115 —> 50.91 < 115, confirmed.
Final Classification
Flange is Class 1, web is Class 2. The section is Class 2 (Compact): the plastic moment can be reached but with limited rotation capacity due to the web. For Class 2 sections:
Z_e = min(S, 1.5 x Z) = min(640, 1.5 x 559) = min(640, 838.5) = 640 x 10^3 mm^3
The effective section modulus equals the plastic section modulus for strength design.
Step 2 — Section Moment Capacity Ms (AS 4100 Clause 5.2)
For a Class 2 section with full lateral restraint:
M_s = Z_e x f_y = 640 x 10^3 x 300 = 192.0 x 10^6 N.mm = 192.0 kN.m
Design Moment Capacity
phi = 0.90 (AS 4100 Table 3.4, bending)
phi x M_s = 0.90 x 192.0 = 172.8 kN.m
Flexural Utilisation (full restraint assumption)
M* / (phi x M_s) = 189.0 / 172.8 = 1.094 — this slightly exceeds unity at full moment.
This tells us the 310UB40.4 is borderline under the maximum design moment if we assume full lateral restraint. However, the actual design moment reduces near the supports — a more refined approach or adding intermediate restraints will be needed. We will check lateral torsional buckling next.
Step 3 — Shear Capacity Vv (AS 4100 Clause 5.11)
The nominal shear capacity depends on the web slenderness. For unstiffened webs, the shear buckling check is:
d_p / t_w = (d - 2 x t_f) / t_w = (304 - 20.4) / 6.1 = 283.6 / 6.1 = 46.49
The shear yield limit per AS 4100 Clause 5.11.2:
Limit = 82 / sqrt(f_y / 250) = 82 / sqrt(300 / 250) = 82 / 1.095 = 74.84
Since 46.49 < 74.84, the web is stocky enough that shear yielding (not buckling) governs.
Nominal Shear Capacity
For a web where shear yielding controls:
V_w = 0.6 x f_y x A_w
where A_w = d x t_w = 304 x 6.1 = 1,854 mm^2
V_w = 0.6 x 300 x 1,854 = 333,720 N = 333.7 kN
Design Shear Capacity
phi = 0.90 (shear)
phi x V_v = 0.90 x 333.7 = 300.4 kN
Shear Utilisation
V* / (phi x V_v) = 105.1 / 300.4 = 0.350 — shear is not governing.
Since V* < 0.6 x (phi x V_v) = 180.2 kN, no shear-bending interaction check is required per Clause 5.12.
Step 4 — Lateral Torsional Buckling Mb (AS 4100 Clause 5.6)
When the compression flange is not continuously laterally restrained, the member moment capacity Mb accounts for lateral-torsional buckling (LTB). The lateral restraint spacing is 1.8m (composite deck purlins at 1.8m centres).
Step 4a — Modified Slenderness lambda_n
lambda_n = (L_e / r_y) x sqrt(f_y / 250)
Using the reduced effective length approach: L_e = k_t x k_l x k_r x L_s
For a simply supported beam with load applied to the top flange and segment with lateral restraint at both ends:
- k_t = 1.0 (load height factor — top flange loading, conservative)
- k_l = 1.0 (no intermediate lateral restraint within the segment)
- k_r = 1.0 (standard restraint condition at ends)
- L_s = 1.8 m (segment length between lateral restraints)
L_e = 1.0 x 1.0 x 1.0 x 1,800 = 1,800 mm
lambda_n = (1,800 / 33.2) x sqrt(300 / 250) = 54.22 x 1.095 = 59.4
Step 4b — Slenderness Reduction Factor alpha_s
AS 4100 Table 5.6.1 gives alpha_s as a function of lambda_n. For lambda_n = 59.4:
For a rolled I-section with k_f = 1.0, the slenderness reduction factor alpha_s is obtained from AS 4100 Table 5.6.1(1), which provides tabulated values as a function of the modified slenderness lambda_n and the section type (rolled or welded).
Interpolating from Table 5.6.1(1) for lambda_n = 59.4:
alpha_s = 0.835 (rolled I-section, compact section table).
Step 4c — Moment Modification Factor alpha_m
alpha_m accounts for the shape of the bending moment diagram between lateral restraints. For a simply supported beam under uniformly distributed load, from AS 4100 Table 5.6.1:
For a UDL on a simply supported span with end restraints: alpha_m = 1.13 (bending moment gradient factor)
Step 4d — Member Moment Capacity Mb
M_b = alpha_m x alpha_s x M_s <= M_s
M_b = 1.13 x 0.835 x 192.0 = 181.2 kN.m
Design LTB Capacity
phi x M_b = 0.90 x 181.2 = 163.1 kN.m
LTB Utilisation
M* / (phi x M_b) = 189.0 / 163.1 = 1.159 — LTB would exceed capacity.
This result shows that at 1.8m restraint spacing, the 310UB40.4 is marginally below the design requirement for the full span moment. Two options:
- Reduce lateral restraint spacing — adding a bridging member or purlin at mid-span of the 1.8m segment would reduce L_e and increase alpha_s.
- Increase section — a 310UB46.2 would provide additional capacity with minimal weight increase.
If we reduce the effective segment length to L_s = 0.9 m (adding an intermediate brace):
lambda_n = (900 / 33.2) x 1.095 = 29.7 alpha_s (from Table 5.6.1) approximately 0.956 M_b = 1.13 x 0.956 x 192.0 = 207.5 kN.m phi x M_b = 0.90 x 207.5 = 186.8 kN.m M* = 189.0 / 186.8 = 1.012 — still borderline.
Recommendation: Upgrade to 310UB46.2 for this application, or verify that the slab provides continuous torsional restraint (which would eliminate LTB entirely).
Step 5 — Deflection Check (AS 4100 Appendix B)
Serviceability limits per AS 1170.0 and AS 4100 Appendix B Table B1 for floor beams:
- Total deflection: L / 250 = 7,200 / 250 = 28.8 mm
- Live load deflection: L / 360 = 7,200 / 360 = 20.0 mm
Total Deflection (G + 0.7 x Q at SLS)
delta_total = 5 x w_sls x L^4 / (384 x E x I_x)
delta_total = 5 x 18.4 x (7,200)^4 / (384 x 200,000 x 85.0 x 10^6)
= 5 x 18.4 x 2.688 x 10^15 / (384 x 200,000 x 85.0 x 10^6)
= 2.473 x 10^17 / 6.528 x 10^15
= 37.9 mm
This exceeds the L/250 limit of 28.8 mm. Total deflection governs — the 310UB40.4 is inadequate for serviceability at this span.
Live Load Deflection
delta_live = 5 x (0.7 x Q_lineload) x L^4 / (384 x E x I_x)
d_live = 5 x (0.7 x 10.8) x 2.688 x 10^15 / 6.528 x 10^15
= 5 x 7.56 x 2.688 x 10^15 / 6.528 x 10^15
= 15.6 mm
This is within the L/360 = 20.0 mm limit for live load deflection alone. The problem is the total deflection including dead load.
Step 6 — Web Bearing at Supports (AS 4100 Clause 5.13)
Web bearing capacity at the support must be checked against the concentrated support reaction. Assume a 150 mm bearing length at the support.
Design Bearing Capacity
phi x R_by = phi x 1.25 x b_bf x t_w x f_y (when the bearing length extends at least 1:1 from the end)
Where b_bf = bearing length + 2.5 x (t_f + r) = 150 + 2.5 x (10.2 + 11.4) = 150 + 54 = 204 mm
phi x R_by = 0.90 x 1.25 x 204 x 6.1 x 300 = 0.90 x 466,650 = 420.0 kN
R* = 105.1 kN < 420.0 kN — bearing capacity at the support is adequate by a large margin.
Web Bearing Buckling
phi x R_bb = phi x alpha_c x A_b x f_y
The effective compression member for web bearing buckling is a strip of web with an effective length:
L_e_b = 2.5 x d_1 = 2.5 x 283.6 = 709 mm
A_b = t_w x b_bf_eff = 6.1 x 204 = 1,244 mm^2
r_w = t_w / sqrt(12) = 6.1 / 3.464 = 1.76 mm
lambda_n_b = (L_e_b / r_w) x sqrt(f_y / 250) = (709 / 1.76) x 1.095 = 403 x 1.095 = 441
This is extremely slender — web buckling at the support would govern unless bearing stiffeners are provided. For a standard office beam with light support reactions in a composite slab, web stiffeners are typically not required if the reaction R* is below about 50 kN. However, our reaction of 105.1 kN exceeds this, so:
Provide 2 x 80 x 10 mm bearing stiffeners at each support.
Summary of Design Checks — 310UB40.4
| Limit State | Clause | Capacity (phi-R) | Design Action | D/C Ratio | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Section moment | Cl. 5.2 | 172.8 kN.m | 189.0 kN.m | 1.094 | FAIL |
| Lateral-torsional buckle | Cl. 5.6 | 163.1 kN.m | 189.0 kN.m | 1.159 | FAIL |
| Shear (web yielding) | Cl. 5.11 | 300.4 kN | 105.1 kN | 0.350 | PASS |
| Web bearing | Cl. 5.13 | 420.0 kN | 105.1 kN | 0.250 | PASS |
| Total deflection | App. B | 28.8 mm | 37.9 mm | 1.316 | FAIL |
| Live load deflection | App. B | 20.0 mm | 15.6 mm | 0.780 | PASS |
The 310UB40.4 fails section moment capacity marginally and total deflection significantly at a 7.2 m span. For production design, the 310UB46.2 (I_x = 101 x 10^6 mm^4, Z_e = 790 x 10^3 mm^3) would be the minimum recommended section.
AS 4100 vs International Beam Design — Comparison
| Design Aspect | AS 4100:2020 | AISC 360-22 | EN 1993-1-1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moment capacity | Ms = Ze x fy (Cl. 5.2) | Mn = Mp or Fy x Zx (Ch F) | Mc,Rd = Wpl x fy / gamma_M0 |
| Capacity factor | phi = 0.90 | phi_b = 0.90 | gamma_M0 = 1.00 |
| LTB formulation | alpha_m x alpha_s x Ms | Cb x Mp (Ch F) | chi_LT x My,Rd |
| Section classification | 4 classes (Cl. 5.2) | Compact/Non/Slender | Class 1-4 |
| Shear-bending interaction | 0.6 x Vv threshold (Cl. 5.12) | 0.6 x Vn threshold | 0.5 x Vpl,Rd (Cl. 6.2.8) |
| Deflection limits (floor) | L/250 total, L/360 live | L/240 total, L/360 live | L/200 total (UK NA) |
| Web bearing method | Cl. 5.13 (yield + buckle) | J10 (yield + crippling) | Cl. 6.2.6 (shear only) |
AS 4100 uses the same multi-curve approach as EN 1993 for LTB but with different notation. The alpha_s reduction factor in AS 4100 is structurally analogous to chi_LT in EN 1993, but the buckling curve imperfection parameters differ to reflect Australian fabrication tolerances.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does AS 4100 calculate the section moment capacity Ms for a steel beam?
AS 4100 Clause 5.2 calculates the nominal section moment capacity Ms = Ze x fy for sections with full lateral restraint. The effective section modulus Ze is the lesser of S (plastic modulus) or 1.5 x Z (elastic modulus) for compact sections. For a 310UB40.4 in Grade 300, Ms = 640x10^3 x 300 = 192 kN.m, with the capacity factor phi-Ms = 0.90 giving a design capacity of 173 kN.m.
When does lateral torsional buckling control AS 4100 beam design?
Lateral torsional buckling per AS 4100 Clause 5.6 controls when the beam's compression flange lacks continuous lateral restraint. The member moment capacity Mb = alpha-m x alpha-s x Ms, where alpha-s is the slenderness reduction factor. For a 310UB40.4 with 3.0m segment length, the modified slenderness lambda-n = 127 produces alpha-s = 0.461, reducing the design moment capacity from 173 kN.m to about 80 kN.m. Full lateral restraint (purlin at 1.5m spacing) can reduce lambda-n to 64 and increase alpha-s to 0.812.
How does AS 4100 handle shear and bending interaction in beam design?
AS 4100 Clause 5.12 requires a shear-bending interaction check when the design shear force V* exceeds 0.6 x phi-Vv. The interaction formula is M* <= phi-Mrv where Mrv is the reduced moment capacity accounting for the shear stress in the web. For a simply supported 310UB40.4 under uniform load, the maximum moment and maximum shear occur at different locations (mid-span and support), so interaction rarely governs. For a continuous beam over an internal support where both are high simultaneously, the interaction check becomes critical.
What is the alpha-m moment modification factor in AS 4100?
The alpha-m factor in AS 4100 Clause 5.6.1.1 accounts for the bending moment distribution between lateral restraints. For a simply supported beam under uniformly distributed load, alpha-m = 1.13. For a central point load on a simply supported span, alpha-m = 1.35. For a beam segment under a uniform moment (no gradient), alpha-m = 1.0. The factor amplifies the reference buckling moment and effectively increases the lateral torsional buckling capacity for beams with moment gradients.
Try it now: Check your beam design with our free Australian Beam Capacity calculator
Related Pages
- AS 4100 Column Design — 200UC46 Worked Example — Axial compression and buckling
- AS 4100 Bolt Design Guide — Clause 9.3 — Bolted connections to AS 4100
- AS 4100 Fillet Weld Design — Clause 9.7 — Weld capacity SP/GP method
- AS 4100 Load Combinations — AS 1170.0 — ULS/SLS/STB combinations
- Australia AS 4100 Steel Design Guide — Complete standards reference
- Steel Beam Capacity Calculator — Free multi-code beam calculator
- Australian Beam Sizes — UB, UC, PFC Chart — Complete section database
- Deflection Limits — International Comparison — Multi-code limits
This page is for educational reference. All resistance formulae are per AS 4100:2020 with AS/NZS 3679.1 section properties. Verify the applicable edition of the National Construction Code for your project jurisdiction. Results are PRELIMINARY — NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION without independent review by a registered structural engineer (CPEng/RPEQ).