Canadian Combined Loading — Axial + Bending Interaction per CSA S16 Clause 13.8
Complete reference for beam-column design per CSA S16-19 Clause 13.8. Covers interaction equations, moment magnification (U1/U2 factors), biaxial bending, interaction diagrams, and a step-by-step worked example for a W310x107 column-beam.
Quick access: Column design → | Beam design → | Column capacity calculator →
CSA S16 Interaction Equations
Per CSA S16-19 Clause 13.8.3, members subject to combined axial compression and bending must satisfy:
For Cf/Cr ≥ 0.2: Cf/Cr + (U_x × Mfx)/Mrx + (U_y × Mfy)/Mry ≤ 1.0
For Cf/Cr < 0.2: Cf/(2 × Cr) + (U_x × Mfx)/Mrx + (U_y × Mfy)/Mry ≤ 1.0
Where:
- Cf, Cr = factored axial load and axial resistance (Cr from Clause 13.3)
- Mfx, Mfy = factored moments about x and y axes
- Mrx, Mry = moment resistances about x and y axes (Mr from Clause 13.5-13.6)
- U_x, U_y = moment magnification factors
Moment Magnification
Per CSA S16 Clause 13.8.4, the moment magnification factor U accounts for P-delta effects:
U1 (Non-Sway Magnification — Braced Frame)
U1 = omega_1 / (1 - Cf/Ce) ≥ 1.0
Where:
- omega_1 = equivalent moment factor (= 1.0 for members without transverse loads; = 0.6-1.0 for other cases)
- Ce = pi^2 × E × I / (KL)^2 (Euler buckling load for the axis of bending)
U2 (Sway Magnification — Unbraced Frame)
U2 = 1 / (1 - sum(Cf) × Delta_s / (sum(H) × h_s))
Where:
- sum(Cf) = total factored load for the storey
- Delta_s = first-order lateral deflection
- sum(H) = total storey shear
- h_s = storey height
Alternatively, the simplified method: U2 = 1/(1 - sum(Cf)/sum(Ce_sway))
Omega_1 Factor
| Condition | Omega_1 |
|---|---|
| No transverse loads on member | 0.6-0.4 × (M1/M2) ≥ 0.4 |
| Transverse loads present, ends restrained | 0.85 |
| Transverse loads present, ends unrestrained | 1.00 |
For M1/M2 = -1.0 (double curvature): omega_1 = 0.6 - 0.4(-1.0) = 1.0 For M1/M2 = 0 (one end zero): omega_1 = 0.6 For M1/M2 = +1.0 (single curvature): omega_1 = 0.6 - 0.4(1.0) = 0.2, but minimum is 0.4
Biaxial Bending
Per CSA S16 Clause 13.8.5, for biaxial bending (both Mx and My present):
Cf/Cr + (U_x × Mfx)/Mrx + (U_y × Mfy)/Mry ≤ 1.0
Additionally, the interaction must satisfy:
Mfx/Mrx' + Mfy/Mry' ≤ 1.0 (section capacity check, where Mr' = phi × Mp without LTB reduction)
Both equations must be satisfied for biaxial bending.
Interaction Diagram for W310x107 (350W)
| Cf/Cr Ratio | Mfx/Mrx (uniaxial, y-axis) | Combined Check |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 1.00 | Pure bending |
| 0.1 | 0.90 | Cf/(2Cr) + Mf/Mr = 0.05 + 0.90 = 0.95 |
| 0.2 | 0.80 | Cf/Cr + Mf/Mr = 0.20 + 0.80 = 1.00 |
| 0.4 | 0.60 | 0.40 + 0.60 = 1.00 |
| 0.6 | 0.40 | 0.60 + 0.40 = 1.00 |
| 0.8 | 0.20 | 0.80 + 0.20 = 1.00 |
| 1.0 | 0.00 | Pure axial |
The interaction is linear for Cf/Cr ≥ 0.2 and bilinear below 0.2. This is simpler than the AISC H1-1a parabolic interaction.
Section Classification Under Combined Loading
The interaction classification rules per CSA S16 Table 1 for combined axial and bending:
| Loading Condition | Flange Classification | Web Classification |
|---|---|---|
| Pure compression | Axial limits | Axial limits |
| Pure bending | Flexure limits | Flexure limits |
| Combined (Cf/Cr ≤ 0.15) | Flexure limits | Flexure limits |
| Combined (Cf/Cr > 0.15) | Axial limits | Axial limits |
When Cf/Cr > 0.15, use axial compression limits even for the web. This can cause the classification to shift from Class 1 (flexure) to Class 3 (axial), requiring effective section properties.
Worked Example — Combined Loading Check
Given: W310×107 Grade 350W, KLx = 5000 mm (x-x, braced), KLy = 5000 mm (y-y). Factored loads: Cf = 1800 kN, Mfx = 180 kN·m (from eccentric gravity load, with transverse load on member), Mfy = 0 (no weak-axis moment).
Section Properties:
- A = 13,600 mm^2, Zx = 1,720 × 10^3 mm^3
- Ix = 230 × 10^6 mm^4, rx = 136 mm
- Sx = 1,510 × 10^3 mm^3, ry = 77.5 mm
Step 1 — Axial Resistance Cr: KL/ry = 5000/77.5 = 64.5 (weak axis governs — check both) KL/rx = 5000/136 = 36.8 lambda_y = 64.5 × sqrt(350/(pi^2 × 200000)) = 64.5 × 0.01332 = 0.859 Cr = 0.90 × 13,600 × 350 × (1 + 0.859^2.68)^(-0.746) = 2866 kN (from standard column design)
Step 2 — Moment Resistance Mrx: Flange b/2tf = 6.28 → Class 1 Web h/w = 24.3 → Class 1 (axial classification; but Cf/Cr = 1800/2866 = 0.63 > 0.15, so use axial limits) h/w = 24.3 ≤ 35.8 (Class 1 axial limit) → Class 1 overall Mrx = phi × Zx × Fy = 0.90 × 1,720 × 10^3 × 350 / 10^6 = 542 kN·m Check LTB: Lb = 5000 mm, ry = 77.5 mm Lp = 42.1 × 77.5 = 3263 mm Lb = 5000 > Lp → LTB may reduce Mr (assume braced at 3000 mm centres for full capacity)
Step 3 — Moment Magnification (U1, braced frame): Ce_x = pi^2 × E × Ix / (KLx)^2 = pi^2 × 200000 × 230e6 / 5000^2 = 18,160 kN Cf/Ce_x = 1800/18160 = 0.099 omega_1 = 1.0 (transverse load on member with unrestrained ends) U1 = 1.0/(1 - 0.099) = 1.11
Step 4 — Interaction Check: Cf/Cr = 1800/2866 = 0.63 ≥ 0.2, so: Cf/Cr + (U1 × Mfx)/Mrx = 0.63 + (1.11 × 180)/542 = 0.63 + 0.37 = 1.00
Result: W310×107 is adequate. Ratio = 1.00. The combined loading check is satisfied.
P-Delta Effects
Second-order (P-delta) effects are critical in combined loading:
| Effect | Description | Accounted in |
|---|---|---|
| P-delta (P-Δ) | Lateral displacement effect | U2 factor (storey) |
| P-delta (P-δ) | Member curvature effect | U1 factor (member) |
| C-P-delta | Axial load on deformed member | Both U1 and U2 |
Per CSA S16 Clause 8.4, second-order effects must be considered when:
- Delta_s/h_s > 0.0015 (sway frames)
- Cf/Cr > 0.15 (significant axial load)
- Any case where P-delta increases moments by more than 5%
Frequently Asked Questions
When does Cf/(2Cr) apply instead of Cf/Cr in the interaction equation? The equation Cf/(2Cr) + U×Mf/Mr ≤ 1.0 applies when Cf/Cr < 0.2 (low axial load relative to capacity). This bilinear transition provides a more accurate interaction curve — at very low axial loads, the axial term only contributes half, recognising that the member behaves more like a beam than a column.
How does moment magnification (U factor) work in CSA S16 beam-column design? U1 accounts for P-delta within the member: U1 = omega_1/(1 - Cf/Ce). When the axial load approaches the Euler buckling load Ce, the magnification becomes very large. U2 accounts for storey P-delta in sway frames. The magnified moment U×Mf is used directly in the interaction equation.
Do I need to check biaxial bending for columns? Yes, all columns with moments about both axes must satisfy the full interaction equation: Cf/Cr + Ux×Mfx/Mrx + Uy×Mfy/Mry ≤ 1.0. In many practical cases, the weak-axis moment Mfy is small (from eccentric beam reactions or wind), but biaxial effects can reduce capacity significantly when both moments are substantial.
What is the Cf/Cr threshold for using axial vs flexure classification limits? Per CSA S16 Table 1 and Clause 13.8.3, when Cf/Cr > 0.15, use axial compression limits for web classification. When Cf/Cr ≤ 0.15, use flexure limits. This is because a low axial load does not significantly affect the web buckling behaviour, allowing the more generous flexure limits.
Related Pages
- CSA S16 Column Design
- CSA S16 Beam Design
- CSA S16 Effective Length Factor K
- Canadian Compact Section Limits
- CSA S16 Cb (Omega_2) Factor
- Column Capacity Calculator
- Beam Capacity Calculator
- All Canadian References
This page is for educational reference. Combined loading per CSA S16-19 Clause 13.8. Verify interaction equations and moment magnification against CISC Handbook. Results are PRELIMINARY — NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION without independent PE/SE verification.