EN 1993 Torsion Design — Torsional Resistance per Eurocode 3 Cl. 6.2.7

Complete guide to torsional design of steel sections per EN 1993-1-1:2005 Clause 6.2.7. St. Venant (uniform) torsion constant J, warping torsion constant I_w, bimoment B, combined bending and torsion interaction. Torsional properties for I-sections, CHS, RHS, and SHS sections. Worked example for an eccentrically loaded cantilever beam.

Quick access: Beam Design | Column Design | HSS Section Properties


Types of Torsion

Type Description Dominant in
St. Venant (uniform) torsion Pure twist, free warping, shear stress only CHS, RHS, closed sections
Warping torsion Restrained warping, normal + shear stress I-sections, open sections
Combined torsion St. Venant + warping All open sections

Torsional Section Properties

Closed Sections (CHS, RHS, SHS)

For closed hollow sections, St. Venant torsion dominates and warping effects are negligible.

Section Torsion Constant J
CHS J = pi x (D^4 - (D-2t)^4) / 32
RHS/SHS J = 4 x A_0^2 / sum(b/t)

Open Sections (I-sections)

For I-sections, both St. Venant and warping torsion contribute.

Section J (approx) I_w (warping constant)
I-section J = sum(b x t^3 / 3) I_w = I_z x h_s^2 / 4

Torsional Properties — Standard Sections

CHS Sections

Section D (mm) t (mm) J (cm4) tau per unit torque (MPa/Nm)
CHS 88.9x5 88.9 5.0 236 0.75
CHS 114.3x6 114.3 6.0 620 0.55
CHS 139.7x8 139.7 8.0 1460 0.38
CHS 168.3x8 168.3 8.0 2660 0.30
CHS 219.1x10 219.1 10.0 7300 0.19

I-Sections

Section J (cm4) I_w (cm6) Behaviour
IPE 200 6.98 6360 Warping dominant
IPE 330 20.1 49700 Warping dominant
IPE 500 53.4 385000 Warping dominant
HEA 200 24.8 43000 Warping dominant
HEB 200 34.7 78800 Warping dominant
HEB 300 112 491000 Warping dominant

Combined Bending and Torsion (Clause 6.2.7)

For sections subject to combined bending and torsion:

(M_Ed / M_c,Rd)^2 + (B_Ed / B_Rd)^2 + (T_Ed / T_Rd)^2 <= 1.0

Where:


Worked Example — Eccentrically Loaded Cantilever Beam

Cantilever beam, 3.0 m span. HEA 200, S355 steel. Point load at tip: 20 kN, 150 mm eccentricity. T_Ed = 20 x 0.15 = 3.0 kNm.

Property Value
W_pl,y 583 cm3
J 24.8 cm4
I_w 43000 cm6

St. Venant contribution: T_T,Ed = 3.0 x (24.8 / (24.8 + 47100)) = 0.0016 kNm (negligible) Warping contribution: T_W,Ed = 3.0 - 0.0016 = 2.998 kNm (dominant)

Bimoment at support: B_Ed = 2.998 x 3.0 / 2 = 4.50 kNm2

Combined check: (60/207)^2 + 0 + (3.0/3.5)^2 = 0.084 + 0 + 0.73 = 0.81 < 1.0 OK

The torsional component dominates the interaction despite being only 3.0 kNm.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between St. Venant torsion and warping torsion?

St. Venant (uniform) torsion occurs when warping is unrestrained, with resistance through shear stress circulation (governed by J). Closed sections (CHS, RHS) have high J and resist torsion efficiently. Warping torsion occurs when warping is restrained, developing normal stresses (governed by I_w). Open sections (I-beams) predominantly resist torsion through warping action.

When is torsional design required per EN 1993-1-1?

Torsional design per Clause 6.2.7 is required for: edge beams supporting cantilever slabs, eccentrically loaded beams, crane runway girders with lateral loads, curved beams, and spandrel beams. For typical simply supported I-beams with concentric loading, torsional effects are small and may be neglected.


Related Pages


Educational reference only. Torsional design per EN 1993-1-1:2005 Clause 6.2.7. Verify combined interaction with applicable National Annex. Results are PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION without independent verification.

Design Resources

Calculator tools

Reference pages