Australian Hollow Section Guide — RHS, SHS, CHS per AS 1163

Complete engineering reference for Australian structural hollow sections manufactured to AS 1163:2016. Covers Rectangular Hollow Sections (RHS), Square Hollow Sections (SHS), and Circular Hollow Sections (CHS) in Grades C350L0 and C450L0, including section properties, design considerations for compression, bending, and torsion, connection detailing, and worked examples per AS 4100:2020.

Related pages: AU Universal Beam Guide | AU PFC Channel Guide | Cold-Formed Steel Guide | HSS Connection Design

Hollow Section Nomenclature — AS 1163 Designation System

Designation Meaning Example
RHS d x b x t Rectangular Hollow Section: depth x width x thickness RHS 200 x 100 x 6.0
SHS d x t Square Hollow Section: side length x thickness SHS 100 x 100 x 5.0
CHS d x t Circular Hollow Section: outside diameter x thickness CHS 168.3 x 5.4

The complete specification on a drawing should read: 'RHS 200 x 100 x 6.0 Grade C350L0 AS 1163'.


Square Hollow Section (SHS) Properties — Common Sizes

Designation Mass (kg/m) d = b (mm) t (mm) A_g (mm^2) I (10^6 mm^4) Z (10^3 mm^3) r (mm)
SHS 50 x 50 x 4.0 5.39 50 4.0 717 0.259 10.4 19.0
SHS 65 x 65 x 4.0 7.28 65 4.0 969 0.603 18.6 25.0
SHS 75 x 75 x 5.0 10.5 75 5.0 1390 1.16 30.9 28.9
SHS 100 x 100 x 5.0 14.5 100 5.0 1890 2.87 57.4 39.0
SHS 100 x 100 x 6.0 17.2 100 6.0 2240 3.33 66.6 38.6
SHS 100 x 100 x 9.0 24.7 100 9.0 3190 4.52 90.4 37.6
SHS 125 x 125 x 6.0 21.9 125 6.0 2840 6.71 107 48.6
SHS 125 x 125 x 9.0 31.7 125 9.0 4120 9.23 148 47.3
SHS 150 x 150 x 6.0 26.7 150 6.0 3440 12.0 160 59.0
SHS 150 x 150 x 9.0 38.8 150 9.0 5030 16.7 223 57.7
SHS 200 x 200 x 6.0 36.1 200 6.0 4640 29.1 291 79.1
SHS 200 x 200 x 9.0 52.8 200 9.0 6830 41.2 412 77.7
SHS 250 x 250 x 9.0 67.0 250 9.0 8630 82.6 661 97.9
SHS 250 x 250 x 12.5 90.8 250 12.5 11700 108 864 96.0

Rectangular Hollow Section (RHS) Properties — Common Sizes

Designation Mass (kg/m) d (mm) b (mm) t (mm) Ix (10^6 mm^4) Zx (10^3 mm^3) rx (mm) Iy (10^6 mm^4) ry (mm)
RHS 100 x 50 x 5.0 10.5 100 50 5.0 1.18 23.6 34.8 0.38 19.7
RHS 150 x 100 x 5.0 18.2 150 100 5.0 5.58 74.4 55.1 2.81 39.2
RHS 150 x 100 x 6.0 21.5 150 100 6.0 6.45 86.0 54.5 3.23 38.6
RHS 150 x 100 x 9.0 30.9 150 100 9.0 9.01 120 53.1 4.44 37.3
RHS 200 x 100 x 5.0 22.1 200 100 5.0 11.5 115 74.5 3.67 41.6
RHS 200 x 100 x 6.0 26.2 200 100 6.0 13.4 134 73.9 4.24 41.1
RHS 200 x 100 x 9.0 37.9 200 100 9.0 18.9 189 72.0 5.87 39.8
RHS 250 x 150 x 6.0 35.5 250 150 6.0 29.3 235 86.7 12.3 56.3
RHS 250 x 150 x 9.0 52.0 250 150 9.0 42.0 336 84.9 17.4 54.8

Circular Hollow Section (CHS) Properties — Common Sizes

Designation Mass (kg/m) OD (mm) t (mm) A_g (mm^2) I (10^6 mm^4) Z (10^3 mm^3) r (mm)
CHS 48.3 x 4.0 4.37 48.3 4.0 557 0.135 5.59 15.6
CHS 60.3 x 4.0 5.55 60.3 4.0 707 0.284 9.42 20.0
CHS 76.1 x 4.0 7.11 76.1 4.0 906 0.594 15.6 25.6
CHS 88.9 x 4.0 8.38 88.9 4.0 1070 0.967 21.8 30.1
CHS 88.9 x 5.0 10.3 88.9 5.0 1320 1.16 26.0 29.7
CHS 114.3 x 4.0 10.9 114.3 4.0 1390 2.09 36.6 38.9
CHS 114.3 x 5.4 14.5 114.3 5.4 1850 2.70 47.3 38.3
CHS 139.7 x 5.0 16.6 139.7 5.0 2120 4.84 69.3 47.8
CHS 168.3 x 5.4 21.7 168.3 5.4 2760 9.23 110 57.8
CHS 219.1 x 5.9 31.0 219.1 5.9 3950 22.6 206 75.7

AS 1163 Grade Properties — Complete Comparison

Property C250L0 C350L0 C450L0
Yield strength fy (MPa) 250 350 450
Tensile strength fu (MPa) 320 430 500
Minimum elongation 22% 20% 16%
Charpy V-notch (J at 0 degree C) 27 min 27 min 27 min
Carbon equivalent max (CEV) 0.40 0.43 0.45
Design factor phi (flexure) 0.90 0.90 0.90
Design factor phi (compression) 0.90 0.90 0.90
AS 4100 buckling curve alpha_b -0.5 -0.5 -0.5
Relative cost (C350L0 = 1.0) 0.85 1.00 1.12

Torsional Performance — Why Hollow Sections Excel

The key advantage of hollow sections over open sections is their superior torsional resistance:

Section Mass (kg/m) J (10^3 mm^4) Relative J
200UB25.4 25.4 94 1.0
SHS 100 x 100 x 6.0 17.2 5,340 56.8
SHS 125 x 125 x 6.0 21.9 10,700 113.8
CHS 114.3 x 5.4 14.5 5,400 57.4

Comparison: Hollow Sections vs Open Sections

Design Criteria Hollow Section (RHS/SHS/CHS) Open Section (UB/UC/PFC) Winner
Axial compression Good (both axes balanced) Good (UC), Poor (UB minor axis) SHS/CHS
Major axis bending Good Better (more efficient flange) UB
Torsion Excellent Very poor RHS/CHS
Fire resistance (unprotected) Better (lower section factor) Worse (thinner elements) SHS/RHS
Connection cost Higher (special details) Lower (standard bolting) UB/UC
Corrosion resistance Better (no crevices internally) Worse (bolt holes trap water) RHS/CHS
Aesthetics (architectural) Excellent (clean lines) Fair (industrial appearance) SHS/CHS
Cost per tonne 10-20% higher Lower UB/UC

Worked Example: SHS Column Design

Problem: Design a square hollow section column for a 4.5 m effective length carrying a factored axial compression load N* = 580 kN. Use Grade C350L0 (fy = 350 MPa). Pinned ends in a braced frame.

Step 1: Determine effective length

ke = 1.00; Le = 4500 mm

Step 2: Trial section

Try SHS 125 x 125 x 6.0 Grade C350L0: A_g = 2840 mm^2, r = 48.6 mm

Step 3: Check form factor kf

Flat width b_f = 125 - 2 x 2.0 x 6.0 = 101 mm

lambda_e = (101/6.0) x sqrt(350/250) = 16.83 x 1.183 = 19.9

lambda_ey = 40 per AS 4100 Table 6.2.4. lambda_e = 19.9 < 40 — section is fully effective, kf = 1.0.

Step 4: Calculate modified slenderness

lambda_n = (4500/48.6) x 1.0 x sqrt(350/250) = 92.6 x 1.183 = 109.5

Step 5: Determine alpha_c (alpha_b = -0.5 for cold-formed hollow sections)

From AS 4100 Table 6.3.3(1): alpha_c = 0.575 (interpolated)

Step 6: Calculate member capacity

Ns = kf x An x fy = 1.0 x 2840 x 350 / 1000 = 994 kN

Nc = alpha_c x Ns = 0.575 x 994 = 572 kN

phi Nc = 0.90 x 572 = 514 kN < 580 kN — FAIL (utilisation = 1.13)

Step 7: Try heavier section

Try SHS 125 x 125 x 9.0: A_g = 4120 mm^2, r = 47.3 mm

lambda_n = (4500/47.3) x 1.0 x sqrt(350/250) = 95.1 x 1.183 = 112.5

alpha_c = 0.555

Ns = 1.0 x 4120 x 350 / 1000 = 1442 kN

Nc = 0.555 x 1442 = 800 kN

phi Nc = 0.90 x 800 = 720 kN > 580 kN — OK.

Result: SHS 125 x 125 x 9.0 Grade C350L0 AS 1163. Utilisation = 580/720 = 0.81.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between AS 1163 hollow sections and API 5L line pipe?

AS 1163 hollow sections are structural-grade products with guaranteed yield strength, tensile strength, elongation, and Charpy impact values. API 5L line pipe is manufactured for fluid transport and has different quality requirements. For structural applications in Australia, AS 1163 sections must be used unless the engineer explicitly accepts an alternative standard. AS 1163 sections come with a test certificate showing compliance with the structural standard.

Can hollow sections be galvanized after fabrication?

Yes, but hollow sections must have vent holes drilled at both ends (minimum 10 mm diameter for sections up to 100 mm, 12 mm for larger sections) to allow molten zinc to flow through and air to escape during the hot-dip galvanizing process. Without vent holes, trapped air will prevent zinc from coating the internal surface, and the expanding air may cause the section to rupture. The typical specification is two 12 mm diameter holes at each end.

How do I calculate the fire resistance of unprotected hollow sections?

The fire resistance depends on the section factor k_sm (exposed perimeter / volume of steel per unit length) in m^-1. For a fully exposed SHS 150 x 150 x 6.0, k_sm = approximately 174 m^-1. Hollow sections have lower k_sm values than open sections of equivalent mass, providing 5-15 minutes additional unprotected fire resistance. AS 4100 Clause 12 provides the full calculation method.

Are stainless steel hollow sections available to Australian standards?

Yes, stainless steel hollow sections are manufactured to AS/NZS 4673:2001. Common grades are 304 (austenitic) and 316 (marine grade). Stainless hollow sections cost approximately 4-6 times carbon steel per kg. They are typically stocked in limited sizes (50 x 50, 75 x 75, 100 x 100 SHS and 48.3, 60.3, 76.1 CHS). Larger sections require mill orders.


Educational reference only. All design values must be verified against the current edition of AS 4100:2020, AS 1163:2016, and the project specification. This information does not constitute professional engineering advice. Always consult a qualified structural engineer for design decisions.


Disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only. Results must be verified by a licensed professional engineer. Steel Calculator provides preliminary design tools — NOT a substitute for professional engineering judgment.