Step 1: Building Parameters
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Location | Los Angeles, CA 90001 |
| Site coordinates | 34.05ÃÂð N, 118.25ÃÂð W |
| Site Class | D (stiff soil, default unless geotechnical report indicates otherwise) |
| Risk Category | II (office building) |
| Seismic Force-Resisting System (SFRS) | Special Steel Moment Frame (SMF) |
| Total height (hn) | 52 ft |
| Number of stories | 4 |
| Typical story height | 13 ft |
| Seismic weight per floor (W) | 1,200 kips (typical floor), 900 kips (roof) |
| Total seismic weight (W_total) | 3 ÃÂÃÂ 1,200 + 900 = 4,500 kips |
Step 2: Seismic Design Category (SDC)
From ASCE 7-22 Figures 22-1 through 22-7, for Los Angeles:
S_S (short period mapped acceleration) = 1.50g S_1 (1-second mapped acceleration) = 0.60g
Site Class D — Site coefficients (Table 11.4-1 and 11.4-2):
F_a = 1.0 (for S_S âÃÂÃÂ¥ 1.25 and Site Class D) F_v = 1.5 (for S_1 âÃÂÃÂ¥ 0.50 and Site Class D)
Adjusted MCER spectral accelerations:
S_MS = F_a ÃÂÃÂ S_S = 1.0 ÃÂÃÂ 1.50 = 1.50g S_M1 = F_v ÃÂÃÂ S_1 = 1.5 ÃÂÃÂ 0.60 = 0.90g
Design spectral accelerations (ASCE 7-22 Eq 11.4-1 and 11.4-2):
S_DS = (2/3) ÃÂÃÂ S_MS = (2/3) ÃÂÃÂ 1.50 = 1.00g S_D1 = (2/3) ÃÂÃÂ S_M1 = (2/3) ÃÂÃÂ 0.90 = 0.60g
Seismic Design Category (Tables 11.6-1 and 11.6-2):
From Table 11.6-1 (S_DS = 1.00g): Risk Category II, S_DS âÃÂÃÂ¥ 0.50 âÃÂàSDC = D From Table 11.6-2 (S_D1 = 0.60g): Risk Category II, S_D1 âÃÂÃÂ¥ 0.20 âÃÂàSDC = D
Result: SDC = D (both criteria give D)
Step 3: System Parameters (Table 12.2-1)
For Special Steel Moment Frame:
- Response modification coefficient (R) = 8.0
- Overstrength factor (ÃÂéâÃÂÃÂ) = 3.0
- Deflection amplification factor (Cd) = 5.5
- Allowable height limit for SDC D = No limit (SMF, Seismic Design Category D)
Step 4: Fundamental Period (Section 12.8.2)
Approximate period (Ta) per Table 12.8-2:
For steel moment frames: Ct = 0.028, x = 0.80
Ta = Ct ÃÂÃÂ hn^x = 0.028 ÃÂÃÂ (52)^0.80
ln(52) = 3.951 0.80 ÃÂÃÂ 3.951 = 3.161 52^0.80 = e^3.161 = 23.6
Ta = 0.028 ÃÂÃÂ 23.6 = 0.66 seconds
Upper limit for period (Section 12.8.2.1):
Cu = 1.4 (for S_D1 = 0.60g âÃÂÃÂ¥ 0.30g, from Table 12.8-1)
T_max = Cu ÃÂÃÂ Ta = 1.4 ÃÂÃÂ 0.66 = 0.92 seconds
For a steel moment frame, a more accurate period from structural analysis is typically in the 0.9-1.2 second range. We will use T = 0.92 seconds (the code maximum for ELF).
Step 5: Seismic Response Coefficient (Cs)
ASCE 7-22 Equation 12.8-2:
Cs = S_DS / (R/I_e)
Where I_e = 1.0 (Risk Category II, Table 1.5-2)
Cs = 1.00 / (8.0 / 1.0) = 0.125
Check upper limit (Equation 12.8-3): Cs_max = S_D1 / (T ÃÂÃÂ (R/I_e)) Cs_max = 0.60 / (0.92 ÃÂÃÂ 8.0) = 0.082
Check lower limit (Equation 12.8-5): For S_1 âÃÂÃÂ¥ 0.60g: Cs_min = 0.5 ÃÂàS_1 / (R/I_e) = 0.5 ÃÂà0.60 / 8.0 = 0.038
Check absolute minimum (Equation 12.8-6): Cs_min_abs = 0.044 ÃÂÃÂ S_DS ÃÂÃÂ I_e = 0.044 ÃÂÃÂ 1.00 ÃÂÃÂ 1.0 = 0.044
Governing Cs = min(0.125, 0.082) = 0.082, max(0.038, 0.044) = 0.044
Cs = 0.082 (the period-based upper limit governs)
Step 6: Base Shear (ASCE 7-22 Equation 12.8-1)
V = Cs ÃÂÃÂ W_total
V = 0.082 ÃÂÃÂ 4,500 kips
V = 369 kips
Step 7: Vertical Distribution of Seismic Forces (Section 12.8.3)
The lateral force at each level (Fx) is:
Fx = Cvx ÃÂÃÂ V
Where:
Cvx = (wx ÃÂàhx^k) / ÃÂã(wi ÃÂàhi^k)
And k = 1.0 for T âÃÂä 0.5 sec, k = 2.0 for T âÃÂÃÂ¥ 2.5 sec. For T = 0.92 sec, k = 1.0 + (0.92 - 0.50) ÃÂà(2.0 - 1.0)/(2.5 - 0.5) = 1.0 + 0.42 ÃÂà0.5 = 1.21
| Level | wx (kips) | hx (ft) | wx ÃÂÃÂ hx^1.21 | Cvx | Fx (kips) | Story Shear (kips) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roof | 900 | 52 | 900 ÃÂÃÂ 110.1 = 99,090 | 0.35 | 129 | 129 |
| 3rd | 1,200 | 39 | 1,200 ÃÂÃÂ 78.8 = 94,560 | 0.33 | 122 | 251 |
| 2nd | 1,200 | 26 | 1,200 ÃÂÃÂ 49.5 = 59,400 | 0.21 | 77 | 328 |
| 1st | 1,200 | 13 | 1,200 ÃÂÃÂ 22.8 = 27,360 | 0.10 | 37 | 365* |
| Sum | 4,500 | 280,410 | 1.00 | 365 |
*Note: Small rounding difference from the 369 kip total. Always use the exact computed distribution sum.
Step 8: Story Drift Check (Section 12.8.6)
For a preliminary check, assume the moment frame provides a lateral stiffness that limits elastic drift to ÃÂÃÂ_e:
Using a lateral analysis of the frame (performed with the seismic calculator):
Estimated elastic drifts:
| Level | ÃÂÃÂ_e (in) | Cd/I_e | ÃÂÃÂ_max = ÃÂÃÂ_e ÃÂÃÂ C_d / I_e (in) | Allowable ÃÂÃÂ_a (in) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roof | 0.58 | 5.5 | 3.19 | 3.12 (h_sx/40 = 13ÃÂÃÂ12/50 = 3.12) |
| 3rd | 0.52 | 5.5 | 2.86 | 3.12 |
| 2nd | 0.44 | 5.5 | 2.42 | 3.12 |
| 1st | 0.32 | 5.5 | 1.76 | 3.12 |
Drift check at roof: 3.19 in > 3.12 in âÃÂàDrift ratio exceeds 0.020h_sx limit. The moment frame section sizes need to be increased (approximately 5-10% stiffness increase) to bring roof drift under 3.12 in.
Step 9: Diaphragm Forces (Section 12.10.1)
Design force for diaphragm at each level:
F_px = ÃÂã(F_i from level i to roof) ÃÂàw_px / w_total_above
At the 2nd floor: F_p2 = (129 + 122 + 77) ÃÂÃÂ 1,200 / (900 + 1,200 + 1,200) F_p2 = 328 ÃÂÃÂ 1,200 / 3,300 = 119 kips
Minimum: 0.2 ÃÂàS_DS ÃÂàI_e ÃÂàw_px = 0.2 ÃÂà1.00 ÃÂà1.0 ÃÂà1,200 = 240 kips âÃÂàgoverns
Maximum: 0.4 ÃÂÃÂ S_DS ÃÂÃÂ I_e ÃÂÃÂ w_px = 0.4 ÃÂÃÂ 1.00 ÃÂÃÂ 1.0 ÃÂÃÂ 1,200 = 480 kips
Design diaphragm force at 2nd floor = 240 kips
This force must be distributed to the collectors and drag struts at each end of the diaphragm.
Step 10: Redundancy Factor (Section 12.3.4)
For SDC D, the redundancy factor ÃÂÃÂ = 1.3 unless the structure meets either:
- Condition a: Each story has at least 2 bays of perimeter SFRS (moment frame) on each side, OR
- Condition b: Removing a single frame does not reduce story strength by more than 33%
For a 60 ft ÃÂà120 ft building with moment frames on all sides, at least 2 bays of moment frame on each side is likely âÃÂàÃÂà= 1.0.
Summary of Results
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Seismic Design Category | D |
| S_DS / S_D1 | 1.00g / 0.60g |
| R / Cd / ÃÂéâÃÂà| 8.0 / 5.5 / 3.0 |
| Fundamental period (T) | 0.92 sec |
| Cs | 0.082 |
| Base shear (V) | 369 kips |
| Governing drift check | Roof (3.19 > 3.12 in) — redesign needed |
Try the Calculator
Use the Seismic Load Calculator to compute base shear and lateral forces per ASCE 7-22 for your own building parameters and location.
Frequently Asked Questions
When is the Equivalent Lateral Force (ELF) procedure not permitted? ELF is not permitted for structures with significant torsional irregularity, extreme soft story irregularity, or nonparallel lateral force systems in SDC D-F. It is also not permitted for structures exceeding certain height limits depending on the SFRS type. For these cases, Modal Response Spectrum Analysis (Ch 12.9) or Nonlinear Response History Analysis (Ch 16) is required.
What is the difference between seismic base shear from ELF and Response Spectrum Analysis? ELF tends to be conservative for regular structures because it assumes the fundamental mode dominates. Response Spectrum Analysis captures higher mode effects and typically gives lower base shear (10-30% less) for long-period structures. However, RSA requires a full 3D structural model and modal analysis.
How do I determine the seismic weight of a floor? Seismic weight includes dead load plus applicable portions of other loads (25% of floor live load for storage, snow load where applicable, partition weight). For office buildings, include: self-weight of structure (steel frame, slab, deck), superimposed dead loads (MEP, ceiling, flooring, partitions), and the weight of any permanent equipment.
What does the deflection amplification factor Cd mean? Cd amplifies the elastic displacement from the design base shear to estimate the maximum inelastic displacement. Cd = 5.5 for special steel moment frames means the actual roof drift during a design-level earthquake is estimated to be 5.5 times the elastic drift computed from the reduced (R-factor) seismic forces.
See Also
Disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only. Results must be verified by a licensed professional engineer. Steel Calculator provides preliminary design tools — NOT a substitute for professional engineering judgment.