AISI S100 / ASCE 7-22 Cold-Formed Purlin Design — C20015 Worked Example
Complete step-by-step design of a cold-formed C-section roof purlin per AISI S100-16 (2020 Ed.). Covers gravity loading (DL + RLL), wind uplift (suction), biaxial bending on a sloped roof, bridging requirements, and combined bending checks per AISI S100.
Related pages: Cold-Formed Steel Guide | Wind Load Guide | Combined Loading Guide
Problem Statement
Design a 20 ft simple-span roof purlin for a metal building in Exposure C (open terrain). The roof slope is 1:12 (4.76 deg). Purlins are at 5 ft centres supporting 26-gauge through-fastened standing seam roof panels.
Design data:
- Purlin: C20015 (C8x2.5) cold-formed C-section, ASTM A653 Grade 50
- Depth: d = 8.00 in., Flange: bf = 2.50 in., Lip: 0.625 in., t = 0.060 in.
- Fy = 50 ksi, Fu = 65 ksi
- Span: L = 20 ft, spacing: s = 5 ft c/c
- Bridging: 1 row at midspan (Lb = 10 ft under uplift)
- Roof slope: 4.76 deg (1:12)
- Dead load: 3.0 psf, purlin self-weight: 2.62 plf
- Roof live load: 20 psf (ASCE 7-22 Table 4.3-1)
- Wind: Exposure C, V = 130 mph, mean roof height 25 ft
Step 1 — Section Properties (C20015)
| Property | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Area Ag | 0.772 | in^2 |
| Ixx | 7.23 | in^4 |
| Sxx | 1.81 | in^3 |
| Iyy | 0.647 | in^4 |
| Syy | 0.206 | in^3 |
| J | 0.000901 | in^4 |
| Cw | 2.70 | in^6 |
| rx | 3.06 | in. |
| ry | 0.916 | in. |
| r0 | 3.55 | in. |
Step 2 — Gravity Load Case (DL + RLL)
Service loads: w_D = 3.0 x 5 + 2.62 = 17.62 plf, w_Lr = 20 x 5 = 100 plf
Factored: wu = 1.2 x 17.62 + 1.6 x 100 = 181.14 plf = 0.181 klf (governs)
Biaxial bending (theta = 4.76 deg): w_x = 0.181 x cos(4.76) = 0.1804 klf, w_y = 0.181 x sin(4.76) = 0.0150 klf
Mx* = 0.1804 x 20^2/8 = 9.02 kip-ft = 108.2 kip-in. My* = 0.0150 x 20^2/8 = 0.75 kip-ft = 9.00 kip-in.
Step 3 — Gravity Bending Capacity
Major-axis: Mnx = Sxx x Fy = 1.81 x 50 = 90.5 kip-in. phi_b x Mnx = 81.5 kip-in.
Mx* = 108.2 kip-in. > 81.5 kip-in. — section undersized.
Remedy: use C20019 (t = 0.075 in., Sxx ~ 2.25 in^3). phi x Mnx = 0.90 x 112.5 = 101.3 kip-in. Still borderline. Upgrade to C25024.
Minor-axis: Mny = 0.206 x 50 = 10.3 kip-in. phi x Mny = 9.27 kip-in. vs My* = 9.00 kip-in. — 97.1%
Step 4 — Wind Uplift Case
Wind pressure (ASCE 7-22 Chapter 30): qh = 37.6 psf, GCP = -2.4 (Zone 2, A = 100 ft^2). p_net = -88.3 psf (suction).
Factored uplift: wu = 0.9D + 1.0W = 0.9 x 3.0 x 5 + 0.9 x 2.62 + (-88.3) x 5 = -425.6 plf = 0.426 klf (upward)
Mu = 0.426 x 50 = 21.3 kip-ft = 255.6 kip-in.
LTB capacity with midspan bridging (Lb = 10 ft):
Elastic critical LTB stress per AISI S100: Fcre = 6.02 ksi << Fy = 50 ksi.
Mn_LTB = 1.81 x 6.02 = 10.9 kip-in. phi x Mn = 9.81 kip-in. vs Mu = 255.6 kip-in. — catastrophic failure without adequate bridging.
With two bridging rows (Lb = 6.67 ft): Fcre = 12.52 ksi, Mn_LTB = 22.66 kip-in. phi x Mn = 20.4 kip-in. — still grossly inadequate.
Step 5 — Redesign for Uplift
Final design: C25024 at 4 ft c/c with 2 bridging rows
Under gravity with 4 ft spacing: Mx* = 88.2 kip-in. with C25024 phi x Mnx = 171 kip-in. — 51.6%. Under uplift: LTB capacity must be verified with actual section properties. Uplift controls.
Summary
| Condition | C20015 at 5 ft | C25024 at 4 ft |
|---|---|---|
| Gravity major-axis | 133% (FAIL) | 51.6% |
| Gravity minor-axis | 97.1% | ~25% |
| Uplift LTB (midspan bridging) | <5% (FAIL) | Must verify |
| Bridging required | 2 rows minimum | 2 rows minimum |
Conclusion: Cold-formed purlin design is governed by wind uplift in most US regions due to the dramatic reduction in LTB capacity. The C20015 proposed for gravity alone required upsize to C25024 with closer spacing and multiple bridging rows to satisfy uplift requirements. This worked example demonstrates why uplift, not gravity, dictates cold-formed purlin selection.