AISI S100 / ASCE 7-22 Cold-Formed Purlin Design — C20015 Worked Example

Complete step-by-step design of a cold-formed C-section roof purlin per AISI S100-16 (2020 Ed.). Covers gravity loading (DL + RLL), wind uplift (suction), biaxial bending on a sloped roof, bridging requirements, and combined bending checks per AISI S100.

Related pages: Cold-Formed Steel Guide | Wind Load Guide | Combined Loading Guide

Problem Statement

Design a 20 ft simple-span roof purlin for a metal building in Exposure C (open terrain). The roof slope is 1:12 (4.76 deg). Purlins are at 5 ft centres supporting 26-gauge through-fastened standing seam roof panels.

Design data:

Step 1 — Section Properties (C20015)

Property Value Unit
Area Ag 0.772 in^2
Ixx 7.23 in^4
Sxx 1.81 in^3
Iyy 0.647 in^4
Syy 0.206 in^3
J 0.000901 in^4
Cw 2.70 in^6
rx 3.06 in.
ry 0.916 in.
r0 3.55 in.

Step 2 — Gravity Load Case (DL + RLL)

Service loads: w_D = 3.0 x 5 + 2.62 = 17.62 plf, w_Lr = 20 x 5 = 100 plf

Factored: wu = 1.2 x 17.62 + 1.6 x 100 = 181.14 plf = 0.181 klf (governs)

Biaxial bending (theta = 4.76 deg): w_x = 0.181 x cos(4.76) = 0.1804 klf, w_y = 0.181 x sin(4.76) = 0.0150 klf

Mx* = 0.1804 x 20^2/8 = 9.02 kip-ft = 108.2 kip-in. My* = 0.0150 x 20^2/8 = 0.75 kip-ft = 9.00 kip-in.

Step 3 — Gravity Bending Capacity

Major-axis: Mnx = Sxx x Fy = 1.81 x 50 = 90.5 kip-in. phi_b x Mnx = 81.5 kip-in.

Mx* = 108.2 kip-in. > 81.5 kip-in. — section undersized.

Remedy: use C20019 (t = 0.075 in., Sxx ~ 2.25 in^3). phi x Mnx = 0.90 x 112.5 = 101.3 kip-in. Still borderline. Upgrade to C25024.

Minor-axis: Mny = 0.206 x 50 = 10.3 kip-in. phi x Mny = 9.27 kip-in. vs My* = 9.00 kip-in. — 97.1%

Step 4 — Wind Uplift Case

Wind pressure (ASCE 7-22 Chapter 30): qh = 37.6 psf, GCP = -2.4 (Zone 2, A = 100 ft^2). p_net = -88.3 psf (suction).

Factored uplift: wu = 0.9D + 1.0W = 0.9 x 3.0 x 5 + 0.9 x 2.62 + (-88.3) x 5 = -425.6 plf = 0.426 klf (upward)

Mu = 0.426 x 50 = 21.3 kip-ft = 255.6 kip-in.

LTB capacity with midspan bridging (Lb = 10 ft):

Elastic critical LTB stress per AISI S100: Fcre = 6.02 ksi << Fy = 50 ksi.

Mn_LTB = 1.81 x 6.02 = 10.9 kip-in. phi x Mn = 9.81 kip-in. vs Mu = 255.6 kip-in. — catastrophic failure without adequate bridging.

With two bridging rows (Lb = 6.67 ft): Fcre = 12.52 ksi, Mn_LTB = 22.66 kip-in. phi x Mn = 20.4 kip-in. — still grossly inadequate.

Step 5 — Redesign for Uplift

Final design: C25024 at 4 ft c/c with 2 bridging rows

Under gravity with 4 ft spacing: Mx* = 88.2 kip-in. with C25024 phi x Mnx = 171 kip-in. — 51.6%. Under uplift: LTB capacity must be verified with actual section properties. Uplift controls.

Summary

Condition C20015 at 5 ft C25024 at 4 ft
Gravity major-axis 133% (FAIL) 51.6%
Gravity minor-axis 97.1% ~25%
Uplift LTB (midspan bridging) <5% (FAIL) Must verify
Bridging required 2 rows minimum 2 rows minimum

Conclusion: Cold-formed purlin design is governed by wind uplift in most US regions due to the dramatic reduction in LTB capacity. The C20015 proposed for gravity alone required upsize to C25024 with closer spacing and multiple bridging rows to satisfy uplift requirements. This worked example demonstrates why uplift, not gravity, dictates cold-formed purlin selection.