-------- | ------ | ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Carbon | C | 0.05-0.25% (structural) | Increases strength and hardness, decreases ductility and weldability | | Manganese | Mn | 0.30-1.60% | Increases strength and hardenability, removes sulfur | | Silicon | Si | 0.15-0.40% | Deoxidizer, increases strength slightly | | Phosphorus | P | 0.01-0.04% | Increases strength, decreases ductility (kept low) | | Sulfur | S | 0.01-0.05% | Decreases ductility (kept low), improves machinability in free-machining steels | | Copper | Cu | 0.20-0.60% | Atmospheric corrosion resistance (weathering steel) | | Chromium | Cr | 0.30-1.25% | Corrosion resistance, hardenability | | Nickel | Ni | 0.25-0.75% | Toughness, corrosion resistance | | Vanadium | V | 0.01-0.15% | Grain refinement, increases strength | | Columbium (Nb) | Cb | 0.005-0.05% | Grain refinement, microalloyed steels | | Molybdenum | Mo | 0.05-0.25% | Hardenability, high-temperature strength | | Aluminum | Al | 0.02-0.08% | Deoxidizer, grain refinement | | Titanium | Ti | 0.01-0.05% | Grain refinement in HSLA steels |

Chemical Composition by ASTM Specification

A36 — Carbon Steel

Element Shapes (%) Plate (%) Bars (%)
Carbon (C) 0.26 max 0.25-0.29 (by thickness) 0.26-0.29 (by size)
Manganese (Mn) — 0.80-1.20 —
Phosphorus (P) 0.04 max 0.04 max 0.04 max
Sulfur (S) 0.05 max 0.05 max 0.05 max
Silicon (Si) 0.40 max 0.40 max 0.40 max
Copper (Cu) 0.20 min (when specified) 0.20 min 0.20 min

A992 — Structural Shapes (W, M, S, HP)

Element Requirement (%)
Carbon (C) 0.23 max
Manganese (Mn) 0.50-1.50
Phosphorus (P) 0.035 max
Sulfur (S) 0.045 max
Silicon (Si) 0.40 max
Copper (Cu) 0.60 max
Vanadium (V) 0.11 max (if reported)
Columbium (Cb) 0.05 max (if reported)
Carbon equivalent 0.47 max (optional)

A572 — High-Strength Low-Alloy

Grade C max (%) Mn (%) P max (%) S max (%) Si max (%)
42 0.21 1.35 0.04 0.05 0.40
50 0.23 1.35 0.04 0.05 0.40
55 0.25 1.35 0.04 0.05 0.40
60 0.26 1.35 0.04 0.05 0.40
65 0.26 1.35-1.65 0.04 0.05 0.40

May also contain vanadium (0.01-0.15%), columbium (0.005-0.05%), or nitrogen (0.003-0.015%) as strengthening elements.

A588 — Weathering Steel

Element Range (%)
Carbon (C) 0.19 max
Manganese (Mn) 0.80-1.25
Phosphorus (P) 0.04 max
Sulfur (S) 0.05 max
Silicon (Si) 0.30-0.65
Nickel (Ni) 0.40 max
Chromium (Cr) 0.40-0.65
Copper (Cu) 0.25-0.40
Vanadium (V) 0.02-0.10

The combination of Cu, Cr, and Ni forms the protective patina that gives weathering steel its corrosion resistance.

A514 — Quenched and Tempered

Element Range (%)
Carbon (C) 0.12-0.21 (by thickness)
Manganese (Mn) 0.70-1.30
Phosphorus (P) 0.035 max
Sulfur (S) 0.04 max
Silicon (Si) 0.20-0.50
Chromium (Cr) 0.40-0.85
Molybdenum (Mo) 0.15-0.35
Nickel (Ni) varies by grade

A500 — HSS (Cold-Formed)

Element Gr B (%) Gr C (%)
Carbon (C) 0.26 max 0.23 max
Manganese (Mn) 1.35 max 1.35 max
Phosphorus (P) 0.035 max 0.035 max
Sulfur (S) 0.045 max 0.045 max
Copper (Cu) 0.20 min (when Cu steel) 0.20 min

A1085 — HSS (Enhanced)

Element Requirement (%)
Carbon (C) 0.22 max
Manganese (Mn) 1.35 max
Phosphorus (P) 0.030 max
Sulfur (S) 0.040 max
Silicon (Si) 0.35 max
Carbon equivalent 0.45 max

Tighter chemistry than A500, plus mandatory Charpy V-notch toughness testing.

Carbon Equivalent (CE)

The carbon equivalent predicts weldability. Higher CE means greater risk of hydrogen-induced cracking.

IIW Formula: CE = C + Mn/6 + (Cr+Mo+V)/5 + (Ni+Cu)/15

CE Range Weldability Preheat Required
< 0.35 Excellent None
0.35-0.40 Good None to minimal
0.40-0.45 Fair Low preheat (50-150°F)
0.45-0.50 Marginal Moderate preheat (150-300°F)
> 0.50 Poor High preheat (300-500°F) + low-hydrogen practice
Steel Grade Typical CE Preheat Guidance
A36 0.35-0.45 Usually none for thin sections
A992 0.40-0.47 Low preheat for thick weldments
A572 Gr 50 0.38-0.45 Low preheat for thick sections
A572 Gr 65 0.45-0.50 Moderate preheat required
A588 0.43-0.50 Low-moderate preheat
A514 0.45-0.55 High preheat + strictly controlled procedures

Stainless Steel Composition

Grade C max (%) Cr (%) Ni (%) Mn (%) Other
304 0.08 18-20 8-11 2.0 max —
304L 0.03 18-20 8-12 2.0 max Low carbon for welding
316 0.08 16-18 10-14 2.0 max Mo 2.0-3.0%
316L 0.03 16-18 10-14 2.0 max Mo 2.0-3.0%, low C
410 0.15 11.5-13.5 — 1.0 max Martensitic
430 0.12 16-18 — 1.0 max Ferritic
2205 (duplex) 0.03 21-23 4.5-6.5 2.0 max Mo 2.5-3.5%, N 0.08-0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

What elements are in structural steel? Structural steel (A992, A572) contains primarily iron with 0.10-0.25% carbon, 0.50-1.50% manganese, up to 0.40% silicon, and trace amounts of phosphorus, sulfur, and microalloying elements (vanadium, columbium). The total alloy content is typically under 2%.

Why is carbon content limited in structural steel? Carbon increases strength but decreases ductility, toughness, and weldability. Structural steels are designed for good weldability and ductility, so carbon is kept below 0.25%. Higher-strength grades use microalloying elements (V, Cb) instead of more carbon.

What makes weathering steel (A588) corrosion resistant? The combination of copper (0.25-0.40%), chromium (0.40-0.65%), and nickel (up to 0.40%) forms a dense, adherent oxide patina that inhibits further corrosion. This patina develops over 2-5 years of atmospheric exposure.

What is the carbon equivalent and why does it matter? The carbon equivalent (CE) is a single number that predicts weldability. It combines the effects of all alloying elements into a carbon-equivalent value. Higher CE means the steel is more susceptible to hydrogen-induced cracking during welding, requiring preheat and low-hydrogen welding practice.

Does chemical composition affect structural design? Indirectly. Composition determines Fy, Fu, ductility, toughness, and weldability, which all affect design. AISC specifications assume minimum mechanical properties regardless of exact composition. For welding procedures, composition (especially CE) directly determines preheat requirements.

Try it now: Check your chemical composition with our free Steel Grade Selection calculator →

Related Pages

Disclaimer

This is a calculation tool, not a substitute for professional engineering certification. All results must be independently verified by a licensed Professional Engineer (PE) or Structural Engineer (SE) before use in construction, fabrication, or permit documents. The user is responsible for the accuracy of all inputs and the verification of all outputs. [object Object]

[object Object]

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the recommended design procedure for this structural element?

The standard design procedure follows: (1) establish design criteria including applicable code, material grade, and loading; (2) determine loads and applicable load combinations; (3) analyze the structure for internal forces; (4) check member strength for all applicable limit states; (5) verify serviceability requirements; and (6) detail connections. Computer analysis is recommended for complex structures, but hand calculations should be used for verification of critical elements.

How do different design codes compare for this calculation?

AISC 360 (US), EN 1993 (Eurocode), AS 4100 (Australia), and CSA S16 (Canada) follow similar limit states design philosophy but differ in specific resistance factors, slenderness limits, and partial safety factors. Generally, EN 1993 uses partial factors on both load and resistance sides (γM0 = 1.0, γM1 = 1.0, γM2 = 1.25), while AISC 360 uses a single resistance factor (φ). Engineers should verify which code is adopted in their jurisdiction.

Design Resources

Calculator tools