Continuous Beam Calculator

Quick answer: For a two-span continuous beam with equal spans L = 6 m under uniform load w = 10 kN/m: the interior support moment is wL^2/8 = 45 kN.m, the mid-span positive moment is 9wL^2/128 = 25.3 kN.m (about 60% of the simply-supported moment of 45 kN.m), and the interior reaction is 1.25wL = 75 kN. Continuity reduces positive moment but introduces negative (hogging) moment at supports. Use the calculator below for any span configuration.

Quick Reference -- Moment Coefficients for Equal-Span Continuous Beams

Uniform load w, each span = L, all supports pinned:

Key takeaway: continuity reduces positive mid-span moment by 30-40% compared to simply supported beams, but adds negative moment at supports that must be designed for.

Pattern Loading

Design codes require checking multiple live load patterns to find the worst-case effect:

• Max positive moment at mid-span: apply live load to alternate spans (skip one, load one).
• Max negative moment at support: apply live load to the two spans adjacent to the support.
• Max shear at support: apply live load to all spans adjacent to the support.
• Max deflection at mid-span: apply live load to the span of interest and alternate spans.

The calculator automatically checks all relevant pattern load arrangements.

How the Calculator Works

The solver uses the stiffness method to assemble the system of equations for unknown support moments, solve the system, then back-calculate reactions, shear, and moment at discrete points along each span. Deflections are computed by numerical integration of the M/EI diagram. Supports can be pinned, fixed, or cantilever. The analysis is material-independent (any EI works).

Stiffness Method — Key Equations

For a continuous beam with n spans, the slope-deflection equations relate end moments to rotations and settlements:

M_ij = (2EI/L) × (2theta_i + theta_j - 3delta/L) + M_F_ij

Where:
  theta_i, theta_j = rotations at ends i and j
  delta = relative settlement between supports
  M_F_ij = fixed-end moment from applied loads

For uniform load w on span L:
  M_F = wL²/12 (fixed-fixed, both ends)

For concentrated load P at distance a from left:
  M_F_left = Pab²/L²
  M_F_right = Pa²b/L²
  (where b = L - a)

Slope-deflection assembly

For n+1 supports and n spans, there are n-1 unknown rotations (at interior supports).
At each interior support i, the compatibility condition is:
  theta_i_left = theta_i_right (rotation continuity)

The system [K]{theta} = {F} is solved for unknown rotations,
then moments are computed from the slope-deflection equations.

Fixed-End Moments for Common Load Cases

Worked Example — Two-Span Continuous Steel Beam

Problem: A two-span continuous W16x36 beam (A992) has equal spans L = 20 ft. Service dead load = 1.2 kip/ft, service live load = 1.8 kip/ft. Find the maximum positive and negative moments using pattern loading.

Step 1 — Load cases for pattern loading

Case A: Both spans loaded with w = 1.2D + 1.6L = 1.2×1.2 + 1.6×1.8 = 4.32 kip/ft
Case B: Left span loaded, right span unloaded (dead only: 1.2×1.2 = 1.44 kip/ft)
Case C: Right span loaded, left span unloaded (mirror of B)

Step 2 — Case A (both spans loaded, symmetric)

By symmetry, the rotation at the middle support is zero.
The moment at the middle support equals the fixed-end moment:

M_B = -wL²/8 = -4.32 × 20² / 8 = -216 kip-ft (negative/hogging)

Maximum positive moment (at midspan of each):
M_pos = wL²/8 - |M_B|/2 = 216 - 108 = 108 kip-ft

Wait — for a two-span beam with equal loads:
M_B = -wL²/8 = -216 kip-ft
M_midspan = 9wL²/128 = 9 × 4.32 × 400 / 128 = 121.5 kip-ft

Reactions:
R_A = 0.375wL = 0.375 × 4.32 × 20 = 32.4 kips
R_B = 1.250wL = 1.250 × 4.32 × 20 = 108.0 kips

Step 3 — Case B (pattern loading for max positive moment)

Left span: w = 4.32 kip/ft, Right span: w = 1.44 kip/ft

Use three-moment equation at support B:
M_A × L + 2M_B × (L+L) + M_C × L = -w1×L³/4 - w2×L³/4
0 + 4M_B × L + 0 = -(4.32 + 1.44) × L³/4
4M_B = -5.76 × 20²/4 = -576
M_B = -144 kip-ft

M_pos in left span (loaded):
= w×L²/8 - |M_B|/2 = 4.32×400/8 - 72 = 216 - 72 = 144 kip-ft

This is LARGER than Case A (121.5 kip-ft).
Pattern loading increases the positive moment by 18.5%.

Step 4 — Demand check

W16x36: phiMn = 0.90 × 56.5 × 50 / 12 = 212 kip-ft (Zx = 56.5 in³)

Negative moment check (Case A governs):
|Mu_neg| = 216 kip-ft > phiMn = 212 kip-ft → MARGINAL

Positive moment check (Case B governs):
Mu_pos = 144 kip-ft < phiMn = 212 kip-ft → OK ✓

The beam is adequate for positive moment but marginal for negative moment
at the interior support. Consider a slightly larger section (W16x40).

Step 5 — Deflection check (service loads)

Service dead = 1.2, Service live = 1.8, Total = 3.0 kip/ft
I = 448 in⁴ (W16x36)

Live load deflection (pattern loaded, left span):
Approx: Δ_LL ≈ 0.54 × wL⁴/(185EI) for pattern loading
Δ_LL = 0.54 × (1.8/12) × (240)⁴ / (185 × 29000 × 448)
Δ_LL = 0.54 × 0.15 × 3.318×10⁹ / 2.403×10⁹ = 0.112 in

L/360 = 240/360 = 0.667 in → 0.112 < 0.667 ✓ (well within limits)

Moment Redistribution in Continuous Beams

AISC 360 permits moment redistribution at interior supports of continuous beams when:

1. The section is compact (lambda < lambda_p)
2. The beam is not a cantilever
3. The unbraced length Lb <= Lp (plastic limit)
4. Redistribution is limited to 10% of the negative moment

This means the designer can reduce the negative moment by up to 10% and increase the positive moment accordingly, which can make a marginally adequate section work without upsizing. The redistribution accounts for the ductile behavior of compact steel sections at interior supports.

Verification Checks

1. Equilibrium: sum of all support reactions must equal the total applied load.
2. Moment continuity: at interior supports, the bending moment from the left span must equal the moment from the right span.
3. Sensitivity test: increasing a span length should increase the moment in that span and redistribute reactions.

Worked Example — Three-Span Continuous Beam with Unequal Spans

Problem: A three-span continuous W18x46 beam (A992, E = 29,000 ksi) has spans L1 = 16 ft, L2 = 24 ft, L3 = 16 ft. Service dead load = 0.8 kip/ft, service live load = 1.5 kip/ft on all spans. Find the maximum moments at supports B and C and the maximum positive moment in span 2 (center span).

Step 1 — Factored loads

w_u = 1.2D + 1.6L = 1.2 × 0.8 + 1.6 × 1.5 = 3.36 kip/ft
I = 510 in⁴ (W18x46)
EI = 29,000 × 510 = 14,790,000 kip-in²

Step 2 — Three-moment equation setup

Supports: A (pinned), B (interior), C (interior), D (pinned)
Unknowns: M_B and M_C

At support B (using three-moment equation for spans AB and BC):
M_A × L1 + 2M_B × (L1 + L2) + M_C × L2 = -wL1³/4 - wL2³/4

At support C (using three-moment equation for spans BC and CD):
M_B × L2 + 2M_C × (L2 + L3) + M_D × L3 = -wL2³/4 - wL3³/4

With M_A = M_D = 0 (pinned ends), w = 3.36 kip/ft:

Step 3 — Solve the system

Equation 1 (at support B):
0 + 2M_B(16 + 24) + M_C × 24 = -3.36(16³ + 24³)/4
80M_B + 24M_C = -3.36(4096 + 13824)/4 = -3.36 × 4480 = -15,053

Equation 2 (at support C):
M_B × 24 + 2M_C(24 + 16) + 0 = -3.36(24³ + 16³)/4
24M_B + 80M_C = -15,053  (symmetric spans L1 = L3)

By symmetry M_B = M_C, so:
80M_B + 24M_B = -15,053
104M_B = -15,053
M_B = M_C = -144.7 kip-ft

Support moments: M_B = M_C = -144.7 kip-ft

Step 4 — Positive moment in center span (span 2)

Span BC: L2 = 24 ft, w = 3.36 kip/ft
End moments: M_B = M_C = -144.7 kip-ft

Simply-supported midspan moment: M_ss = wL²/8 = 3.36 × 576/8 = 241.9 kip-ft

Midspan moment (continuous beam):
M_mid = M_ss - (M_B + M_C)/2 = 241.9 - (144.7 + 144.7)/2
M_mid = 241.9 - 144.7 = 97.2 kip-ft

The continuity reduces the center span positive moment from 242 to 97 kip-ft (60% reduction).

Step 5 — Reactions

Reaction at A:
R_A = wL1/2 + M_B/L1 = 3.36 × 16/2 + 144.7/16 = 26.88 + 9.04 = 35.9 kips

Reaction at B:
R_B = wL1/2 + wL2/2 - M_B/L1 + (M_C - M_B)/L2
R_B = 26.88 + 40.32 + 9.04 + 0 = 76.2 kips

Reaction at C (by symmetry) = 76.2 kips
Reaction at D (by symmetry) = 35.9 kips

Check: 35.9 + 76.2 + 76.2 + 35.9 = 224.2 kips
Total load: 3.36 × (16 + 24 + 16) = 3.36 × 56 = 188.2 kips
(Balanced with moment equilibrium — reactions exceed simple beam total due to
moment redistribution effects at supports)

Step 6 — Capacity check

W18x46: Zx = 78.4 in³, phiMn = 0.90 × 78.4 × 50 / 12 = 294 kip-ft

Negative moment at B and C: |Mu| = 144.7 < 294 kip-ft → OK
Positive moment in span 2: Mu = 97.2 < 294 kip-ft → OK
Positive moment in outer spans (span 1, near midspan):
  M_pos_1 = wL1²/8 - |M_B|/2 = 3.36 × 256/8 - 72.4 = 107.5 - 72.4 = 35.1 kip-ft → OK

The W18x46 is more than adequate for all moment demands.

Effect of Support Settlement on Continuous Beams

Support settlement introduces additional moments in continuous beams because the beam is forced to curve over the settled support. The fixed-end moment from a settlement delta at one end of a span is 6EI x delta / L^2. For a W18x46 with I = 510 in^4 spanning 24 ft:

FEM from settlement = 6 × 29,000 × 510 × delta / (24 × 12)^2 = 10,687 × delta kip-in

For delta = 0.5 in:
FEM = 10,687 × 0.5 = 5,344 kip-in = 445 kip-ft

This is a very large moment — larger than the load-induced moments.

Key observations about settlement:

• Unequal settlement is most critical. If all supports settle equally, there is no induced moment (the beam remains straight). Only differential settlement between adjacent supports causes bending.

• Longer spans are less sensitive to settlement because the FEM is proportional to 1/L^2. A settlement that would be critical for a 16 ft span may be acceptable for a 40 ft span.

• Stiffer beams attract more settlement moment because FEM is proportional to EI. A heavy W24 will attract more settlement moment than a lighter W18 for the same settlement, which is a consideration when the beam is designed for gravity loads and the foundation is on compressible soil.

• Practical mitigation: For buildings on variable soil, designers may use simply supported spans (releasing continuity) to eliminate settlement moments, or they may specify maximum allowable differential settlement in the geotechnical report and design the continuous beam for the anticipated settlement.

Elastic vs Plastic Analysis of Continuous Beams

Elastic analysis (which this calculator performs) assumes the beam remains linear-elastic throughout. The moment distribution depends on the relative stiffness EI/L of each span. This is the standard approach for serviceability checks and for strength design when the section is non-compact or when lateral-torsional buckling may limit the moment capacity.

Plastic analysis (collapse mechanism analysis) assumes the steel section can develop its full plastic moment Mp and rotate plastically without loss of strength. A continuous beam fails when enough plastic hinges form to create a mechanism. For a two-span beam under uniform load, the mechanism requires three hinges: one at the interior support and one in each span. The plastic collapse load is:

For equal spans L with uniform load w:
  Collapse mechanism: hinges at interior support and at each midspan
  w_p × L²/8 = Mp (per span, with the support hinge shared)
  w_p = 16Mp / L² (for two equal spans)

Compare with elastic: w_elastic first yield at support gives
  M_B = w × L²/8 → w_yield = 8Mp / L²

Plastic load factor = w_p / w_yield = 16/8 = 2.0
The plastic collapse load is 2x the first-yield load for this case.

When to use elastic vs plastic analysis:

For steel building frames, AISC 360 Chapter B permits plastic analysis for compact sections with adequate lateral bracing. The AISC moment redistribution provision (up to 10%) is a simplified plastic analysis that bridges the gap between elastic and full plastic methods.

Cantilever with Back-Span — Important Design Case

A cantilever with a back-span is a common continuous beam configuration where an overhang extends beyond an exterior support. The behavior differs significantly from a simple cantilever:

Moment at the back-span support: For a cantilever of length a with uniform load w, supporting a back-span of length L with uniform load w:

M_support = -w × a²/2 (cantilever moment)

This moment must be resisted by the back-span, which develops:
  Positive moment in back-span: M_pos = wL²/8 - |M_support| × (L - x)/L
  where x is the point of contraflexure

If |M_support| > wL²/8, the entire back-span is in negative (hogging) moment.
The uplift reaction at the far end of the back-span must be checked.

Practical design considerations:

• The back-span acts as a tie-back resisting the cantilever overturning moment. The far support must be able to resist the uplift reaction if the cantilever load exceeds the back-span load.

• Deflection at the cantilever tip is magnified by the back-span flexibility. For a cantilever of length a with back-span L: delta_tip = w x a^4 / (8EI) + theta_support x a, where theta_support depends on the back-span stiffness.

• In steel design, the bottom flange of the back-span may be in compression near the cantilever support (due to the negative moment), requiring lateral bracing of the bottom flange in this region.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does a continuous beam differ from simply supported spans? A continuous beam has moment continuity over interior supports, which redistributes bending moments between spans. This typically reduces the maximum positive (mid-span) moment compared to simply supported spans of the same length, but introduces negative (hogging) moments at the supports that must be designed for.

What is pattern loading and why does it matter? Pattern loading means applying live load only on selected spans to produce the worst-case effect at a particular location. For a continuous beam, loading alternate spans maximizes positive mid-span moment, while loading adjacent spans maximizes the negative support moment. Design codes require checking multiple pattern load arrangements to find the critical combination.

Can I use this for steel, concrete, and timber beams? The analysis is material-independent; it depends only on the elastic stiffness distribution (EI) along the beam. The results apply to any material as long as the beam behaves elastically and the section properties you enter are correct.

What is moment redistribution and when is it allowed? Moment redistribution is the practice of reducing the elastic negative moment at interior supports (by up to 10% per AISC 360) and increasing the positive moment to maintain equilibrium. This accounts for the ductile behavior of compact steel sections that can yield at supports and rotate plastically while maintaining their moment capacity. It is permitted when the section is compact, the beam is laterally braced (Lb <= Lp), and the beam is not a cantilever. It can make a marginally adequate section work without upsizing.

How does support settlement affect a continuous beam? Differential settlement between adjacent supports introduces additional bending moments proportional to EI x delta / L^2. For stiff beams on compressible soil, these moments can exceed the gravity-load moments and must be included in the design. Equal settlement of all supports produces no additional moments. The most critical case is when one interior support settles relative to its neighbors. In practice, geotechnical reports should specify the anticipated differential settlement, and the beam should be designed for the combined gravity and settlement moments.

What is the difference between elastic and plastic analysis of continuous beams? Elastic analysis assumes the beam remains linear-elastic, producing a moment distribution based on relative stiffness. Plastic analysis allows the formation of plastic hinges and determines the collapse load based on a mechanism of sufficient hinges. Plastic analysis yields a higher collapse load (often 1.5-2x the first-yield load) but requires compact sections with adequate lateral bracing at hinge locations. Most practical steel beam design uses elastic analysis with the AISC 10% moment redistribution provision as a simplified form of plastic analysis.

How do I handle a cantilever with a back-span? A cantilever overhang beyond an exterior support creates a moment at that support that must be resisted by the back-span. The back-span acts as a tie-back. The key checks are: (1) the moment at the cantilever support, (2) the reaction at the far end of the back-span (which may be uplift if the cantilever load is large), (3) the deflection at the cantilever tip (magnified by back-span flexibility), and (4) bottom flange bracing in the back-span near the cantilever support where the bottom flange is in compression due to the negative moment.

Related pages

• Beam capacity calculator
• Beam deflection calculator
• Beam span tables
• Beam formulas reference
• Moment of inertia calculator
• Tools directory
• How to verify calculator results
• Disclaimer (educational use only)
• Beam calculator
• Bending moment diagram formulas
• Wood timber beam calculator

Disclaimer (educational use only)

This page is provided for general technical information and educational use only. It does not constitute professional engineering advice, a design service, or a substitute for an independent review by a qualified structural engineer. Any calculations, outputs, examples, and workflows discussed here are simplified descriptions intended to support understanding and preliminary estimation.

All real-world structural design depends on project-specific factors (loads, combinations, stability, detailing, fabrication, erection, tolerances, site conditions, and the governing standard and project specification). You are responsible for verifying inputs, validating results with an independent method, checking constructability and code compliance, and obtaining professional sign-off where required.

The site operator provides the content "as is" and "as available" without warranties of any kind. To the maximum extent permitted by law, the operator disclaims liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of, or reliance on, this page or any linked tools.