Design Problem
Given:
- Beam span: 8.0 m (simple supports)
- Tributary width: 4.0 m (beams at 4 m spacing)
- Dead load: 3.0 kPa (50 mm concrete slab on steel deck + mechanical + ceiling)
- Live load: 4.0 kPa (open office per NBCC Table 4.1.5.3)
- Steel grade: CSA G40.21 350W
- Lateral bracing: Full bracing at supports, intermediate braces at 2.67 m spacing (third points)
- Simply supported beam with uniform distributed loads
- Deflection limit: L/360 for live load
Objective: Select an adequate W-shape beam and verify all limit states.
Step 1 — Factored Loads Per NBCC 2020
Unfactored loads:
Dead load: w_D = 3.0 kPa ÃÂà4.0 m = 12.0 kN/m Self-weight: Estimate W610x125 âÃÂà1.25 kN/m (W610x125 = 125 kg/m ÃÂà9.81 m/sÃÂò / 1,000) Total dead: w_D = 12.0 + 1.25 = 13.25 kN/m
Live load: w_L = 4.0 kPa ÃÂÃÂ 4.0 m = 16.0 kN/m
Factored load (ULS):
Governing combination: NBCC Comb. 2 — 1.25D + 1.5L
w_f = 1.25 ÃÂÃÂ 13.25 + 1.5 ÃÂÃÂ 16.0 = 16.56 + 24.0 = 40.56 kN/m
Maximum factored moment:
M_f = w_f ÃÂàLÃÂò / 8 = 40.56 ÃÂà8.0ÃÂò / 8 = 40.56 ÃÂà64 / 8 = 324.5 kNÃÂ÷m
Maximum factored shear:
V_f = w_f ÃÂÃÂ L / 2 = 40.56 ÃÂÃÂ 8.0 / 2 = 162.2 kN
Step 2 — Select Trial Section
Required plastic modulus (assuming Class 1 or 2 section):
Z_x_req = M_f / (ÃÂàÃÂàF_y) = 324.5 ÃÂà10âÃÂö / (0.90 ÃÂà350) = 1.030 ÃÂà10âÃÂö mmÃÂó
Try W610x125 (US equivalent W24x84):
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| d | 612 mm |
| b_f | 229 mm |
| t_f | 19.6 mm |
| t_w | 11.9 mm |
| Z_x | 3,330 ÃÂà10ÃÂó mmÃÂó |
| S_x | 2,970 ÃÂà10ÃÂó mmÃÂó |
| I_x | 908 ÃÂà10âÃÂö mmâÃÂô |
| r_y | 49.8 mm |
| Mass | 125 kg/m âÃÂà1.23 kN/m |
Actual self-weight = 1.23 kN/m vs estimated 1.25 kN/m — close enough. No iteration needed.
Step 3 — Section Classification (Cl. 11.2, Table 2)
Flange classification (for flexure):
b = b_f / 2 = 229 / 2 = 114.5 mm (half-flange for I-section in flexure) b/t = 114.5 / 19.6 = 5.84
Limits for F_y = 350 MPa:
Class 1: b/t âÃÂä 145/âÃÂÃÂ350 = 7.75
Class 2: b/t âÃÂä 170/âÃÂÃÂ350 = 9.09
5.84 < 7.75 âÃÂàClass 1 flange âÃÂÃÂ
Web classification (for flexure):
h = d - 2 ÃÂÃÂ t_f = 612 - 2 ÃÂÃÂ 19.6 = 572.8 mm h/w = 572.8 / 11.9 = 48.1
Limits for F_y = 350 MPa:
Class 1: h/w âÃÂä 1,100/âÃÂÃÂ350 = 58.8
Class 2: h/w âÃÂä 1,700/âÃÂÃÂ350 = 90.9
48.1 < 58.8 âÃÂàClass 1 web âÃÂÃÂ
Overall classification:
Both flange and web are Class 1. The section is Class 1 and can develop the full plastic moment with adequate rotation capacity.
Step 4 — Flexural Resistance (Cl. 13.5, 13.6)
Plastic moment capacity:
M_p = Z_x ÃÂàF_y = 3,330 ÃÂà10ÃÂó ÃÂà350 / 10âÃÂö = 1,165.5 kNÃÂ÷m
ÃÂàÃÂàM_p = 0.90 ÃÂà1,165.5 = 1,049.0 kNÃÂ÷m
Check lateral-torsional buckling:
First, determine if LTB governs. The limiting unbraced length L_u:
r_t = radius of gyration of compression flange + 1/3 web in compression For doubly symmetric I-section: r_t âÃÂàr_y for simplification
L_u = 0.68 ÃÂàsqrt(E/F_y) ÃÂàr_y âÃÂà1.1 ÃÂàr_y ÃÂàsqrt(E/F_y)
L_u = 1.1 ÃÂÃÂ 49.8 ÃÂÃÂ sqrt(200,000 / 350) = 1.1 ÃÂÃÂ 49.8 ÃÂÃÂ 23.9 = 1,309 mm = 1.31 m
Actual unbraced length L_b = 2.67 m > L_u = 1.31 m âÃÂàLTB check required.
Elastic LTB moment (Cl. 13.6.5):
For W610x125:
- I_y = 39.5 ÃÂà10âÃÂö mmâÃÂô (weak axis moment of inertia)
- J = 1,230 ÃÂà10ÃÂó mmâÃÂô (Saint-Venant torsional constant)
- C_w = 2,990 ÃÂà10âÃÂù mmâÃÂö (warping constant)
L_b = 2,670 mm
M_u = ÃÂÃÂâÃÂàÃÂà(ÃÂÃÂ/L_b) ÃÂàsqrt(E ÃÂàI_y ÃÂàG ÃÂàJ + (ÃÂàÃÂàE / L_b)ÃÂò ÃÂàI_y ÃÂàC_w)
ÃÂÃÂâÃÂà= 1.14 (uniformly distributed load over the span, simple supports — from Table 3-2, CISC Handbook)
First term: E ÃÂàI_y ÃÂàG ÃÂàJ = 200,000 ÃÂà39.5 ÃÂà10âÃÂö ÃÂà77,000 ÃÂà1,230 ÃÂà10ÃÂó = 200,000 ÃÂà39.5 ÃÂà10âÃÂö ÃÂà77,000 ÃÂà1,230 ÃÂà10ÃÂó = 200,000 ÃÂà77,000 ÃÂà39.5 ÃÂà1,230 ÃÂà10âÃÂù = 1.54 ÃÂà10ÃÂùâÃÂð ÃÂà4.859 ÃÂà10âÃÂô ÃÂà10âÃÂù = 7.48 ÃÂà10ÃÂòÃÂó NÃÂòÃÂ÷mmâÃÂö
Second term: (ÃÂàÃÂàE / L_b)ÃÂò ÃÂàI_y ÃÂàC_w = (ÃÂàÃÂà200,000 / 2,670)ÃÂò ÃÂà39.5 ÃÂà10âÃÂö ÃÂà2,990 ÃÂà10âÃÂù = (235.5)ÃÂò ÃÂà39.5 ÃÂà2,990 ÃÂà10ÃÂùâÃÂõ = 55,460 ÃÂà1.181 ÃÂà10ÃÂòâÃÂð = 6.55 ÃÂà10ÃÂòâÃÂô NÃÂòÃÂ÷mmâÃÂö
Combined: 7.48 ÃÂà10ÃÂòÃÂó + 6.55 ÃÂà10ÃÂòâÃÂô = 7.30 ÃÂà10ÃÂòâÃÂô
sqrt(7.30 ÃÂà10ÃÂòâÃÂô) = 2.70 ÃÂà10ÃÂùÃÂò NÃÂ÷mmÃÂó
M_u = 1.14 ÃÂà(ÃÂà/ 2,670) ÃÂà2.70 ÃÂà10ÃÂùÃÂò = 1.14 ÃÂà0.001177 ÃÂà2.70 ÃÂà10ÃÂùÃÂò = 3.62 ÃÂà10âÃÂù NÃÂ÷mm = 3,620 kNÃÂ÷m
Check LTB resistance:
0.67 ÃÂàM_p = 0.67 ÃÂà1,165.5 = 780.9 kNÃÂ÷m
M_u = 3,620 kNÃÂ÷m > 780.9 kNÃÂ÷m âÃÂàinelastic LTB region applies:
M_r = 1.15 ÃÂÃÂ ÃÂÃÂ ÃÂÃÂ M_p ÃÂÃÂ (1 - 0.28 ÃÂÃÂ M_p / M_u)
= 1.15 ÃÂà1,049.0 ÃÂà(1 - 0.28 ÃÂà1,165.5 / 3,620) = 1,206.4 ÃÂà(1 - 0.0902) = 1,206.4 ÃÂà0.9098 = 1,097.4 kNÃÂ÷m
BUT M_r cannot exceed ÃÂàÃÂàM_p = 1,049.0 kNÃÂ÷m
Therefore: M_r = 1,049.0 kNÃÂ÷m
Check:
M_f / M_r = 324.5 / 1,049.0 = 0.309 âÃÂà— Flexure is adequate with significant reserve.
Step 5 — Shear Resistance (Cl. 13.4)
Web slenderness for shear:
h/w = 48.1 Limit for shear buckling: 439 ÃÂÃÂ sqrt(k_v / F_y) where k_v = 5.34 (unstiffened web)
439 ÃÂÃÂ sqrt(5.34 / 350) = 439 ÃÂÃÂ 0.1235 = 54.2
48.1 < 54.2 âÃÂàShear buckling does not govern. Use basic shear equation.
Shear resistance:
V_r = ÃÂÃÂ ÃÂÃÂ 0.60 ÃÂÃÂ F_y ÃÂÃÂ d ÃÂÃÂ t_w
= 0.90 ÃÂÃÂ 0.60 ÃÂÃÂ 350 ÃÂÃÂ 612 ÃÂÃÂ 11.9 / 1,000 = 0.90 ÃÂÃÂ 0.60 ÃÂÃÂ 350 ÃÂÃÂ 7,283 / 1,000 = 1,377 kN
Check:
V_f / V_r = 162.2 / 1,377 = 0.118 âÃÂà— Shear is not critical for this W-shape under uniform loading.
Step 6 — Deflection Check (Serviceability)
Live load deflection (governs per NBCC):
w_L = 16.0 kN/m (unfactored)
ÃÂô_LL = 5 ÃÂàw_L ÃÂàLâÃÂô / (384 ÃÂàE ÃÂàI_x)
= 5 ÃÂà16.0 ÃÂà(8,000)âÃÂô / (384 ÃÂà200,000 ÃÂà908 ÃÂà10âÃÂö)
= 5 ÃÂà16.0 ÃÂà4.096 ÃÂà10ÃÂùâÃÂõ / (384 ÃÂà200,000 ÃÂà908 ÃÂà10âÃÂö)
= 3.277 ÃÂà10ÃÂùâÃÂ÷ / 6.973 ÃÂà10ÃÂùÃÂó
= 4,700 mmâÃÂô ÃÂ÷ kN/mÃÂò / mmâÃÂô... Let me recalculate carefully.
= 5 ÃÂà16.0 ÃÂà4,096 ÃÂà10ÃÂùÃÂò / (384 ÃÂà200,000 ÃÂà908 ÃÂà10âÃÂö)
= 5 ÃÂà16.0 ÃÂà4.096 ÃÂà10ÃÂùâÃÂõÃÂùâÃÂô... let me be precise:
5 ÃÂà16.0 = 80 80 ÃÂà8,000âÃÂô = 80 ÃÂà4.096 ÃÂà10ÃÂùâÃÂõ = 3.277 ÃÂà10ÃÂùâÃÂ÷
384 ÃÂàE ÃÂàI = 384 ÃÂà200,000 ÃÂà908 ÃÂà10âÃÂö = 384 ÃÂà1.816 ÃÂà10ÃÂùâÃÂô = 6.973 ÃÂà10ÃÂùâÃÂö
ÃÂô_LL = 3.277 ÃÂà10ÃÂùâÃÂ÷ / 6.973 ÃÂà10ÃÂùâÃÂö = 4.70 mm ÃÂà(kN/m âÃÂàN/mm)...
Actually, careful with units: w = 16.0 kN/m = 16.0 N/mm L = 8,000 mm E = 200,000 N/mmÃÂò I = 908 ÃÂà10âÃÂö mmâÃÂô
ÃÂô_LL = 5 ÃÂà16.0 ÃÂà8,000âÃÂô / (384 ÃÂà200,000 ÃÂà908 ÃÂà10âÃÂö)
5 ÃÂà16 = 80 80 ÃÂà8,000âÃÂô = 80 ÃÂà4.096 ÃÂà10ÃÂùâÃÂõ = 3.277 ÃÂà10ÃÂùâÃÂ÷ NÃÂ÷mmÃÂó
384 ÃÂà200,000 = 76,800,000 76,800,000 ÃÂà908 ÃÂà10âÃÂö = 6.973 ÃÂà10ÃÂùâÃÂö NÃÂ÷mmÃÂò
ÃÂô_LL = 3.277 ÃÂà10ÃÂùâÃÂ÷ / 6.973 ÃÂà10ÃÂùâÃÂö = 4.70 mm
Allowable live load deflection:
L / 360 = 8,000 / 360 = 22.2 mm
ÃÂô_LL = 4.70 mm < 22.2 mm âÃÂà— Live load deflection is well within limits.
Total load deflection (SLS-1):
w_total = 13.25 + 16.0 = 29.25 kN/m (unfactored)
ÃÂô_total = ÃÂô_LL ÃÂà(29.25 / 16.0) = 4.70 ÃÂà1.828 = 8.59 mm
L / 240 = 8,000 / 240 = 33.3 mm
8.59 mm < 33.3 mm âÃÂà— Total load deflection is adequate.
Step 7 — Lateral Bracing Requirements (Cl. 13.6.2)
Bracing spacing:
Maximum bracing spacing for Class 1 sections (Cl. 13.6.2):
L_b_max = 0.86 ÃÂÃÂ r_y ÃÂÃÂ sqrt(E / F_y) ÃÂÃÂ (M_p / M_f) for segments with moment gradient
For the end segment (simple support to first brace at 2.67 m): Moment at brace = w ÃÂàx ÃÂà(L - x) / 2 where x = 2.67 m M_at_brace = 40.56 ÃÂà2.67 ÃÂà(8.0 - 2.67) / 2 = 40.56 ÃÂà2.67 ÃÂà5.33 / 2 = 288.7 kNÃÂ÷m
M_p / M_at_brace = 1,165.5 / 288.7 = 4.04
L_b_max = 0.86 ÃÂÃÂ 49.8 ÃÂÃÂ sqrt(200,000 / 350) ÃÂÃÂ 4.04 = 0.86 ÃÂÃÂ 49.8 ÃÂÃÂ 23.9 ÃÂÃÂ 4.04 = 4,134 mm = 4.13 m
The actual bracing spacing (2.67 m) is less than the maximum (4.13 m) âÃÂàOK.
However, for compactness in design, the actual bracing spacing of 2.67 m already satisfies L_u (1.31 m) check completed above, and the LTB check confirmed the section is adequate.
Step 8 — Final Check Summary
| Check | Demand | Capacity | Ratio | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flexure (M_r) | 324.5 kNÃÂ÷m | 1,049.0 kNÃÂ÷m | 0.31 | âÃÂà|
| Shear (V_r) | 162.2 kN | 1,377 kN | 0.12 | âÃÂà|
| Live load deflection | 4.70 mm | 22.2 mm | 0.21 | âÃÂà|
| Total deflection | 8.59 mm | 33.3 mm | 0.26 | âÃÂà|
| LTB (M_r) | 324.5 kNÃÂ÷m | 1,049.0 kNÃÂ÷m | 0.31 | âÃÂà|
Selected section: W610x125 (Grade 350W) with intermediate bracing at 2.67 m spacing.
Design Optimisation
The W610x125 is conservatively sized (31% flexural utilisation). A lighter section could be considered if deflection does not govern:
Try W530x92 (US equivalent W21x62):
- Z_x = 2,300 ÃÂà10ÃÂó mmÃÂó
- ÃÂàÃÂàM_p = 0.90 ÃÂà2,300 ÃÂà350 / 1,000 = 724.5 kNÃÂ÷m
- M_f = 324.5 kNÃÂ÷m âÃÂàratio = 0.45
Deflection check: I_x for W530x92 = 552 ÃÂà10âÃÂö mmâÃÂô ÃÂô_LL = 4.70 ÃÂà(908 / 552) = 7.73 mm < 22.2 mm âÃÂÃÂ
LTB check (L_b = 2.67 m): r_y = 50.1 mm (similar to W610x125) LTB resistance likely adequate for this short unbraced length.
W530x92 would be adequate with 45% flexural utilisation. The W610x125 was selected to demonstrate the full design procedure for a heavier section, but W530x92 would be more economical in practice.
Related Pages
- Canada CSA S16 Steel Design Guide — Full CSA S16 design reference
- CSA S16 Column Design — Worked Example — Step-by-step column design example
- CSA S16 Column Buckling — Euler & Fcr Curves — Column buckling theory
- CSA S16 Beam Design — Flexure, LTB & Shear — Detailed beam design guide
- Canadian Steel Beam Sizes — W Shapes, HSS — Complete section tables
- Canadian Steel Grades — G40.21 300W to 480W — Material properties
- CSA S16 Load Combinations — NBCC ULS & SLS — Canadian load combination guide
- BEAM Capacity Calculator — Free multi-code beam calculator
Frequently Asked Questions
When should intermediate lateral bracing be provided for a steel beam?
Intermediate lateral bracing is required when the unbraced length L_b exceeds the limiting unbraced length L_u. For a W610x125 in 350W, L_u âÃÂà1.31 m. Without intermediate bracing, the full 8.0 m span would require an LTB check with ÃÂÃÂâÃÂà= 1.14 and L = 8.0 m, resulting in a much lower M_r. For this example, bracing at 2.67 m (one-third points) ensures the beam can develop its full plastic moment. In practice, steel deck with puddle welds at ~300 mm spacing provides continuous lateral restraint to the top (compression) flange, eliminating the need for separate bracing. Unbraced beams (such as crane girders or exposed roof beams) require explicit LTB verification.
How do I check combined bending and shear per CSA S16?
CSA S16 Clause 14.6 requires interaction checks when V_f exceeds 60% of V_r. The interaction equation is: M_f / M_r + 0.6 ÃÂàV_f / V_r âÃÂä 1.33 for V_f / V_r > 0.6. In this worked example, V_f / V_r = 0.118, far below the 0.6 threshold. Shear rarely governs for standard W-shape beams under uniform loading — the interaction check is typically only relevant for beams with heavy concentrated loads near supports (transfer beams, crane girders, and deep plate girders with thin webs). For plate girders (h/w > 440/sqrt(F_y)), the shear resistance may be governed by post-buckling tension field action per Cl. 14.4, and combined bending and shear must always be checked per Cl. 14.5.
What live load deflection limit does NBCC 2020 specify for floors?
NBCC 2020 does not prescribe specific deflection limits — these are established by the engineer of record based on occupancy requirements and industry practice. The commonly used L/360 for live load deflection of floor beams comes from the CSA S16 Commentary (Appendix D) and industry standards. More stringent limits may apply: L/480 for floors with brittle finishes (terrazzo, stone tile, thin-set ceramic), L/600 for vibration-sensitive occupancies (laboratories, operating rooms, gymnasia). The Canadian Sheet Steel Building Institute (CSSBI) provides additional guidance for steel deck floor vibration criteria. For this office beam example, L/360 is appropriate for the 325 Pa partition load allowance.
How is the moment gradient factor ÃÂÃÂâÃÂàdetermined for Canadian beam design?
CSA S16 references ÃÂÃÂâÃÂàfrom Table 3-2 of the CISC Handbook of Steel Construction. The factor accounts for the shape of the bending moment diagram along the unbraced segment: ÃÂÃÂâÃÂà= 1.00 for uniform moment (worst case), 1.14 for uniformly distributed load on a simple span, 1.35 for a central point load, and up to 1.75 for double curvature bending (equal and opposite end moments). The ÃÂÃÂâÃÂàfactor in CSA S16 is conceptually identical to AISC's C_b factor but uses slightly different reference values. Unlike AISC, CSA S16 provides ÃÂÃÂâÃÂàin a single table rather than a formula, making it simpler to use. For segments with linear moment gradient, ÃÂÃÂâÃÂàcan be calculated as 1.75 + 1.05ÃÂò + 0.3ÃÂòÃÂò where ÃÂò = |MâÃÂÃÂ|/|MâÃÂÃÂ| âÃÂä 1.0 at the segment end with the smaller-to-larger moment ratio.
This page is for educational reference. Beam design per CSA S16:24 and NBCC 2020. Verify section properties against current CISC Handbook of Steel Construction. Results are PRELIMINARY — NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION without independent P.Eng. verification.
Design Resources
Calculator tools
- Beam Bending and Shear Calculator
- Beam Displacement and Sag Tool
- Beam Calculator — SFD, BMD & Reactions
- Beam Optimizer — Find Most Efficient Section
- Beam Span Table Tool
Design guides