--------------------- | ------------ | -------------------------------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------ | | Steel strength (tension) | 17.6.1 | phi _ Nsa = 0.75 _ Ase * futa | 0.75 | Ductile steel, deep embedment | | Steel strength (shear) | 17.6.2 | phi * Vsa = 0.65 _ A_se * futa | 0.65 | Ductile steel, deep embedment | | Concrete breakout (tension) | 17.6.3 | phi _ Ncb = 0.70 _ kc * sqrt(f'c) _ A_Nc | 0.70 (cast) | Shallow embedment, group anchors | | Concrete breakout (shear) | 17.6.4 | phi _ Vcb = 0.75 _ kc * sqrt(f'c) _ A_Vc | 0.70-0.75 | Anchors near free edges | | Pullout (tension) | 17.6.5 | phi _ Npn = 0.70 _ psic * 8 _ A_brg * f'c | 0.70 | Headed anchors, insufficient embedment | | Side-face blowout (tension) | 17.6.6 | phi _ Nsb = 0.70 _ 160 _ ca1 * sqrt(ca2) | 0.70 | Anchors near free edge with hef > 2.5*ca1 | | Concrete pryout (shear) | 17.6.7 | phi * Vcp = 0.70 _ k_cp * Ncb | 0.70 | Short anchors in shear (hef < 2.5 in.) | | Combined tension and shear | 17.7 | (Nu/Nn)^5/3 + (Vu/Vn)^5/3 <= 1.0 | N/A | When both tension and shear are present |

Notes on the table:

The phi factors for concrete limit states (0.70) are lower than for steel limit states (0.75 tension, 0.65 shear) because concrete breakout is more variable and less predictable than steel yielding. When ductile anchorage is required (steel failure must control over concrete failure), the designer must ensure phi * Nsa < phi * Ncb for all concrete limit states.

Cast-in vs. post-installed anchor comparison

The choice between cast-in and post-installed anchors affects both the design procedure and the achievable capacity.

Property Cast-In Anchors Post-Installed Anchors
Installation timing Before concrete pour (set in formwork) After concrete has cured (drilled into hardened conc.)
Typical types Headed bolts, J-bolts, L-bolts, welded studs Expansion, undercut, adhesive (chemical)
Design basis ACI 318 Chapter 17 general provisions ACI 318 Chapter 17 + manufacturer's ESR report
Capacity calculation Code equations (k_c = 24) Per ESR report (may differ from code defaults)
Edge distance sensitivity Moderate High (especially expansion anchors near edges)
Inspection requirements Visual before pour (location, embedment) Special inspection per ACI Chapter 17 (torque, pull test)
Quality control Good (verified before pour) Variable (depends on installer and substrate)
Maximum capacity High (limited by embedment and steel strength) Moderate (limited by adhesive/expansion mechanism)
Seismic qualification Inherently qualified Must meet ACI 355.2 or 355.4 for seismic
Fire resistance Good (concrete cover provides insulation) May require supplementary fire protection
Cost Low material, moderate labor (formwork coordination) Higher material, lower labor (no formwork impact)
Retrofit applications Not practical Ideal for existing concrete

When to use cast-in anchors:

When to use post-installed anchors:

Anchor bolt sizing table by column size

The following table provides preliminary anchor bolt selections for common steel column sizes. These are minimum recommendations for typical gravity-loaded columns in low-to-moderate seismic regions. Final anchor design must be verified with full ACI 318 Chapter 17 calculations including all limit states.

Column Section Base Plate (in.) Anchor Bolts Bolt Diameter Embedment (hef) Edge Distance f'c (psi) Typical Axial Load (kips)
W6x15 6 x 6 (4) cast-in 5/8 in. 8 in. 2.0 in. 3,000 30 - 60
W8x31 8 x 8 (4) cast-in 3/4 in. 10 in. 2.5 in. 3,000 60 - 120
W10x33 10 x 8 (4) cast-in 3/4 in. 10 in. 2.5 in. 3,000 60 - 120
W10x45 10 x 10 (4) cast-in 7/8 in. 12 in. 2.75 in. 4,000 100 - 180
W12x40 10 x 10 (4) cast-in 7/8 in. 12 in. 2.75 in. 4,000 100 - 180
W12x65 12 x 12 (4) cast-in 1 in. 14 in. 3.0 in. 4,000 150 - 280
W12x96 14 x 14 (4) cast-in 1-1/4 in. 16 in. 3.5 in. 4,000 250 - 400
W14x61 12 x 12 (4) cast-in 1 in. 14 in. 3.0 in. 4,000 150 - 280
W14x82 14 x 14 (4) cast-in 1-1/4 in. 16 in. 3.5 in. 4,000 250 - 400
W14x120 16 x 14 (4) cast-in 1-1/4 in. 18 in. 3.5 in. 5,000 350 - 550
W14x193 18 x 18 (4) or (6) cast-in 1-1/2 in. 20 in. 4.0 in. 5,000 500 - 900
W14x257 20 x 20 (6) or (8) cast-in 1-1/2 in. 22 in. 4.0 in. 5,000 700 - 1,200

Notes on the sizing table:

Worked example -- (4) 1" anchor bolts for W12x65 base plate

Given: W12x65 column supporting a factored axial load Pu = 220 kips and a factored base moment Mu = 80 kip-ft (from lateral wind load). Base plate is 12 in. x 12 in. x 1 in. thick. Concrete pedestal is 20 in. x 20 in. with f'c = 4,000 psi. Four (4) cast-in 1-inch diameter anchor bolts, ASTM F1554 Grade 55 (fu = 75 ksi, fy = 55 ksi), placed symmetrically at 3.5 inches from the column centerline in each direction (9.5 in. x 9.5 in. bolt spacing).

Step 1 -- Anchor forces from eccentric loading:

Bolt group geometry: 4 bolts at 3.5 in. from center (each quadrant)
  Bolt spacing = 2 * 3.5 = 7.0 in. (each direction)

Moment eccentricity: e = Mu / Pu = (80 * 12) / 220 = 4.36 in.
Since e = 4.36 in. < bolt spacing/2 = 3.5 in... wait:
  Actually, the neutral axis must be calculated for the full base plate.

Using the simplified triangular stress block method:
  e = 4.36 in., with bolts at +/- 3.5 in. from center

For the bearing pressure approach (assuming no tension if e < L/6):
  L = 12 in., L/6 = 2.0 in.
  Since e = 4.36 > L/6 = 2.0, there is tension in the anchor bolts.

Maximum tension in one bolt:
  N_u = (Mu * 3.5 - Pu * 0) / (2 * 3.5^2) ... simplified for symmetric bolt pair
  N_u = (80 * 12 - 220 * 0) / (2 * 3.5) = 960 / 7.0 = 137 kip per pair
  Per bolt: T_u = 137 / 2 = 68.5 kip (approximately, assuming two bolts in tension)

Actually, let me use a more precise calculation. The tension in the two bolts on the tension side:

Taking moments about the compression edge (bearing point at 6 in. from center):
  T_u * 9.5 + Pu * (6 - 0) = Mu ... wait, using equilibrium:

  Sum of moments about the compression edge:
  T_total * (9.5 in.) + Pu * (6 in. - e_total) = 0

  Simpler approach: resolve the moment into a force couple.
  For 2 bolts in tension at 3.5 in. from center, and 2 bolts in compression at -3.5 in.:

  Force couple arm = 7.0 in.
  T_total = Mu / couple_arm = (80 * 12) / 7.0 = 137.1 kip
  T_per_bolt = 137.1 / 2 = 68.6 kip

Factored shear per bolt: V_u = V_base / 4 = (assume V_base = 30 kip) / 4 = 7.5 kip/bolt

Step 2 -- Steel strength check (tension):

phi * Nsa = 0.75 * A_se * fu
  A_se for 1" bolt = 0.606 in^2 (threaded area)
  phi * Nsa = 0.75 * 0.606 * 75 = 34.1 kip

Wait -- fu is limited to min(fu, 1.9*fy, 125 ksi) = min(75, 104.5, 125) = 75 ksi. OK.

T_u = 68.6 kip > phi * Nsa = 34.1 kip --> Steel strength is NOT adequate.

Need to revise: use 1-1/4" anchors or higher grade.
Let me check with ASTM F1554 Grade 105 (fu = 125 ksi):
  phi * Nsa = 0.75 * 0.606 * 125 = 56.8 kip --> Still not enough.

Or increase to 1-1/4" bolts (A_se = 0.969 in^2):
  phi * Nsa = 0.75 * 0.969 * 75 = 54.5 kip --> Still not enough.

Use 1-1/4" bolts with Grade 105:
  phi * Nsa = 0.75 * 0.969 * 125 = 90.8 kip > 68.6 kip --> Steel OK.

Let's proceed with (4) 1-1/4" Grade 105 anchors.

Step 3 -- Concrete breakout (tension):

hef = 14 in. (specified embedment)
Edge distance c_a1 = (20 - 9.5) / 2 = 5.25 in. (from anchor to pedestal edge)

Since hef = 14 > 2.5 * c_a1 = 13.125, the breakout cone is limited by the edge.
Use modified hef per ACI 17.6.3.3:
  hef_mod = 2.5 * c_a1 = 13.125 in. (controls for shallow edge)

k_c = 24 (cast-in anchors)

Single anchor breakout:
  N_co = k_c * sqrt(f'c) * hef_mod^1.5 = 24 * sqrt(4000) * (13.125)^1.5
       = 24 * 63.2 * 47.6 = 72,240 lb = 72.2 kip

Group breakout area modification:
  A_Nc = min(3*hef, s_x + 3*hef) * min(3*hef, s_y + 3*hef)
  Edge reduction: A_Nc / A_Nco < 1.0

  A_Nco = 9 * hef_mod^2 = 9 * (13.125)^2 = 1550 in^2

  Actual projected area (considering 20x20 pedestal and 9.5" spacing):
    x-direction: min(3*13.125, 20) = 20 in. (pedestal limits)
    y-direction: min(3*13.125, 20) = 20 in.
    A_Nc (group of 4) = 20 * 20 = 400 in^2 (limited by pedestal)

  Modification factor: psi_ec,N = 1.0 (eccentricity in line with bolts)

  phi * Ncbg = 0.70 * (A_Nc / A_Nco) * psi_ec,N * N_co
             = 0.70 * (400 / 1550) * 1.0 * 72.2
             = 0.70 * 0.258 * 72.2 = 13.0 kip (per anchor)

Hmm, the group effect significantly reduces capacity. With 4 bolts, total:
  phi * Ncbg_total = 4 * 13.0 = 52.0 kip ... this is less than the required 137 kip.

This indicates the pedestal is too small or the embedment is insufficient.
Options: (a) increase pedestal size, (b) increase embedment, (c) add supplementary reinforcement.

Using supplementary reinforcement (hairpin bars or surface reinforcement):
  phi = 0.75 (instead of 0.70) and the reinforcement resists the breakout.

Step 4 -- Summary and recommendations:

This example illustrates that concrete breakout is often the controlling limit state for anchor bolts, particularly when edge distances are limited by the pedestal or footing dimensions. For the W12x65 with significant overturning moment, the design requires:

For columns with predominantly axial compression and minimal moment, the anchor bolt design is much simpler, often governed by the minimum embedment and edge distance requirements rather than calculated strength.

Run This Calculation

→ Base Plate & Anchors Calculator — full ACI 318 / AS 4100 anchor bolt design with breakout, pullout, and combined tension/shear checks.

→ Anchor Bolts Calculator — standalone anchor bolt capacity screening tool.

Try it now: Check your anchor bolts with our free Base Plate & Anchors calculator →

See Also

Disclaimer (educational use only)

This page is provided for general technical information and educational use only. It does not constitute professional engineering advice, a design service, or a substitute for an independent review by a qualified structural engineer. Any calculations, outputs, examples, and workflows discussed here are simplified descriptions intended to support understanding and preliminary estimation.

All real-world structural design depends on project-specific factors (loads, combinations, stability, detailing, fabrication, erection, tolerances, site conditions, and the governing standard and project specification). You are responsible for verifying inputs, validating results with an independent method, checking constructability and code compliance, and obtaining professional sign-off where required.

The site operator provides the content "as is" and "as available" without warranties of any kind. To the maximum extent permitted by law, the operator disclaims liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of, or reliance on, this page or any linked tools.

Design Resources

Calculator tools

Design guides